🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: bnr.general
Article #84

Re: High Ottawa housing prices due to land cartel?

#84
From: Louis Leclerc
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1993 17:16
58 lines
3679 bytes
Louis Leclerc writes...

>     Ottawa seems to be a bit unusual as a Canadian city, because it is small
>sized, is not near a "desirable" location (ie. sunny beaches...), yet has
>relatively high housing prices and high dwelling density for a city this 
>size. It also has a much higher percentage of high rise appartment buildings 
>and condominiums than one would also expect for a city this size.


rrosch@bnr (RROSCH) responds...
>Subject: OTTAWA REALESTATE PRICES
>
>There was an article a few years ago in the local paper on exactly this
>topic. The gist was that the four big real estate developers of this area
>had bought development rights on virtually all Ottawa land, right down
>to Kemptville. Amangst themselves, they manipulated the market to squeeze
>out the last penny, whatever the market would bear, and then some.
>What does not help is that the average civil servant is a meek and obedient
>creature and will without question pay the price that is asked. That is
>why gasoline and other commodities are more expensive here than anywhere
>else in Canada.


Is there really truth to this? I heard it once before, but dismissed it, but
now that I hear it again I'm not so sure....Does anyone have anything to back 
this up?

Assuming that a cartel is operating...I make the (possibly unfounded) 
presumptions:

Housing prices/appt rents seem to run about 75% to 85% higher than they should
be for a city this size and location. It would seem that if a land cartel is
really operating in Ottawa, as may be the case, why aren't people complaining
about it? Losses due to this must add on the order of many thousands of 
dollars of extra costs to people's mortgages and rents *each year* (ie. way
more loss than the GST, or the social contract which everyone is complaining
so much about).

I would have expected the public service unions to really jump on this, as if
they were able to bust the cartel, real wage gains for Ottawa public servants
would jump overnight, making up for any decreases due to the "social contract".
The same goes for major private employers in the area. If housing prices were
lowered to their natural non-cartel levels, companies could pay employees less
money, and also attract/retain good employees as a good standard of living 
would be possible for people living in the city compared to other cities in
Canada (ie. people could afford to buy much nicer houses in Ottawa, or get a
house period...)

Similar claims can be made for the gas cartel (well documented in "The Ottawa 
Business Quarterly 1993"), though losses to citizens of Ottawa are less than 
would be due to this supposed' housing cartel.


L. Leclerc
-- 
<><>
These opinions are my own. The do not necessarily represent those of 
Bell-Northern Research.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1993Aug6.171607.17300@bmers95.bnr.ca>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!utnut!torn!nott!bnrgate!bmers95!leclercl

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 111a4f,b148c6fc00ffaa10,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid111a4f,public
X-Google-Thread: 10b600,b148c6fc00ffaa10,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b600,public
X-Google-Thread: fcec7,b148c6fc00ffaa10,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfcec7,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-08-06 12:25:51 PST
Newsgroups: bnr.general,ott.general,misc.invest.canada
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!utnut!torn!nott!bnrgate!bmers95!leclercl
From: leclercl@bmerh136.bnr.ca (Louis Leclerc)
Subject: Re: High Ottawa housing prices due to land cartel?
Message-ID: <1993Aug6.171607.17300@bmers95.bnr.ca>
Originator: leclercl@bmerh794
Sender: usenet@bmers95.bnr.ca
Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
Distribution: na
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1993 17:16:07 GMT
Lines: 58