Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.database.ado
Article #1199Re: MDAC version
From: Viatcheslav V. Vassiliev
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:23
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:23
61 lines
3344 bytes
3344 bytes
It is better to have newer MDAC. > repackage it into ActiveX DLL using Visual Basic 6 I do not understand what they want to do. Create additional VB dll that uses your Delphi DLL? When they get this message - when compiling VB dll? And why not write this ActiveX dll in Delphi - you will have one dll that does not depend on msvbvm60.dll? //------------------------------------------ Regards, Vassiliev V. V. http://www.managed-vcl.com - using .Net objects in Delphi for Win32 + ADO.Net http://www.oledbdirect.com - The fastest way to access MS SQL Server, MS Jet (Access) and Interbase (through OLEDB) "YangKai Liu" <yangkai.liu@burkelee.com> �������/�������� � �������� ���������: news:41492eb3@newsgroups.borland.com... > The problem I encountered is as follows: > I made a DLL which accesses databases with ADO. The IT at the production > site tries to repackage it into ActiveX DLL using Visual Basic 6. > Then we have error message 430, which, according to Microsoft, is caused by > "the application references one version of ADO and redistributes a different > version of ADO." > > Can I tell the IT at the production site to use an older version of ADO to > fix the problem? > > > "Viatcheslav V. Vassiliev" <support@oledbdirect.com> �b�l�� > news:41492cf6$1@newsgroups.borland.com �����g... > > This depends on which features your program uses. Usually MDAC 2.5 is > > enough. But, of course, newer version is better. SP4 has no changes in > > MDAC - you could download MDAC from Microsoft site. > > > > //------------------------------------------ > > Regards, > > Vassiliev V. V. > > http://www.managed-vcl.com - using .Net objects in Delphi for Win32 + > > ADO.Net > > http://www.oledbdirect.com - The fastest way to access MS SQL Server, > > MS Jet (Access) and Interbase (through OLEDB) > > > > "YangKai Liu" <yangkai.liu@burkelee.com> ������?�������� ?�������� > > ��������? news:41492884$1@newsgroups.borland.com... > > > I am writing codes with ADO using BCB6. The program will be shipped to > > > producttion site. Which version MDAC is requried at the production > site? > > > Should I install BCB6 SP4, will there be any change to the required MDAC > > > version? > > > > > > > > > > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<41497796@newsgroups.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!gatel-ffm!gatel-ffm!194.25.134.126.MISMATCH!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<41492884$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <41492cf6$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <41492eb3@newsgroups.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10698b,cb2623b489e3d049 X-Google-Attributes: gid10698b,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII From: "Viatcheslav V. Vassiliev" <support@oledbdirect.com> Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.database.ado References: <41492884$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <41492cf6$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <41492eb3@newsgroups.borland.com> Subject: Re: MDAC version Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 15:23:05 +0400 Lines: 63 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.234.218.42 Message-ID: <41497796@newsgroups.borland.com> X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1095333782 213.234.218.42 (16 Sep 2004 04:23:02 -0700) Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!gatel-ffm!gatel-ffm!194.25.134.126.MISMATCH!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail