Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.database.ado
Article #2139CoInitialize/CoUninitialize placement
From: Ted Byers
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 20:26
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 20:26
29 lines
1931 bytes
1931 bytes
I pulled an ADO example project off BDN. I am puzzled by the following two
functions.
void __fastcall TForm1::FormActivate(TObject *Sender)
{
CoInitialize(NULL);
Form1->Catalog=Variant::CreateObject("ADOX.Catalog");
}
//--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
void __fastcall TForm1::FormDeactivate(TObject *Sender)
{
CoUninitialize();
}
Yes, it is fairly obvious as to what they are supposed to do, but why place
calls to CoInitialize and CoUninitialize in FormActivate/FormDeactivate?
Does this provide any advantage or is it just a question of the style and
habits of the person who developed this particular example?
Would it not be better/safer to put calls to CoInitialize and CoUninitialize
in the constructor and destructor of a singleton class, instaniated in a
global static variable? If I could do this, then I'd put the statement
"Form1->Catalog=Variant::CreateObject("ADOX.Catalog");" into TForm1's
constructor (and get rid of the unnecessary "Form1->").
Cheers,
Ted
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3f96e8cd@newsgroups.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10698b,6f95adbac89050a,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10698b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-22 13:40:11 PST From: "Ted Byers" <r.ted.byers@sympatico.ca> Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.database.ado Subject: CoInitialize/CoUninitialize placement Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:26:22 -0400 Lines: 31 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.95.242.89 Message-ID: <3f96e8cd@newsgroups.borland.com> X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1066854605 65.95.242.89 (22 Oct 2003 13:30:05 -0700) Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail