Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.database.ado
Article #2305Re: ADO or BDE/ODBC or ?
From: Viatcheslav V. Vassiliev
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 05:56
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 05:56
41 lines
2812 bytes
2812 bytes
BDE is deprecated and will not be developped. ADO/OLEDB is native way to work with MS Jet and MS SQL Server. If you do not plan to make your application cross-platform (support Linux) ADO is preffered over dbExpress (dbExpress driver for MS SQL Server is not available in BCB6 but it is available in Delphi7 Enterprise). There is also ADO.Net but it requires .Net IDE and is not supported by BCB. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Regards, Viatcheslav V. Vassiliev http://www.oledbdirect.com The fastest way to access MS SQL Server, MS Jet (MS Access) and Interbase (through OLEDB) databases. "Jim Melsom" <jm@uniserve.com> ???????/???????? ? ???????? ?????????: news:3F370A28.7B04@uniserve.com... > The desktop version of our application currently uses BDE/ODBC/Jet with > Access databases. It is designed for a small workgroup with only one > updater. Our next step is to use SQL Server and support up to 30 > concurrent users. Only a few at most will be making changes. The others > will just be doing queries. > > The BDE is convenient, but we would like to dump that dependency. It has > already created installation and support problems for us, and it seems > to be at a dead end development-wise. My impression is that the main > trend in Windows is to ADO for data access. Is that right? What are the > tradeoffs or main points of using ADO vs. BDE/ODBC? Is either one even > suitable for a 30-user system? If not, what would be better? Our main > requirements are: > > - 30 concurrent users with reasonable performance and high reliability > - vendor independence (no extra licenses or highly proprietary > solutions) > > Network operation is not a consideration. We have our own multi-tier > solution for that. We just need to select a suitable server-side > database technology. > > Thanks for any ideas. > > Jim
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3f37330b$1@newsgroups.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-09!supernews.com!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!news.kweb.on.ca!KWeb!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<3F370A28.7B04@uniserve.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10698b,4034ba6e0635b321 X-Google-Attributes: gid10698b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-08-10 23:15:41 PST From: "Viatcheslav V. Vassiliev" <support@oledbdirect.com> Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.database.ado References: <3F370A28.7B04@uniserve.com> Subject: Re: ADO or BDE/ODBC or ? Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 09:56:24 +0400 Lines: 43 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.247.201.57 Message-ID: <3f37330b$1@newsgroups.borland.com> X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1060582155 213.247.201.57 (10 Aug 2003 23:09:15 -0700) Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-09!supernews.com!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!news.kweb.on.ca!KWeb!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail