Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.database.ado
Article #3102Are there limitations using temp tables in ADO?
From: bmkiss67
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:46
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:46
4 lines
1201 bytes
1201 bytes
In trying to use a temp table (#tablename) in ADO and I'm having problems. Are there limitations? Is there a reference somewhere for ADO? Thanks
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3dff6308$1@newsgroups.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-09!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10698b,629b936bb6533594,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10698b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-12-17 10:12:31 PST Reply-To: "bmkiss67" <bmkiss67@cablespeed.com> From: "bmkiss67" <bmkiss67@aaahawk.com> Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.database.ado Subject: Are there limitations using temp tables in ADO? Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 12:46:46 -0500 Lines: 6 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.244.213.207 Message-ID: <3dff6308$1@newsgroups.borland.com> X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1040147208 209.244.213.207 (17 Dec 2002 09:46:48 -0800) Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-09!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail