🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.database.ado
Article #4438

Re: better solution then BDE/ODBC

#4438
From: Unwanted Edict
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 13:08
43 lines
2563 bytes
If you use BCB Pro and Oracle ODBC, you will be unhappy with performance and
the lack of support for all BDE component properties.

However, the BDE comes with native Oracle driver support. This requires the
Enterprise version of C++ Builder, and the Oracle client software. This
provides a stable and efficient driver interface through the BDE. It's also
a breeze to configure your connections.

While our ADO implementation supports Oracle very well, it is not as
full-featured as the BDE with native driver support. This is due to the fact
that ADO is (primarily) targeted at MSSQL and Access, and its reliance on
Oracle OLEDB. Example: trying to retrieve schema metadata for an Oracle
table, or other system data, can be problematic. Also notice that in-place
editors for SQL may not work with all Oracle databases.


"Claus Kessel" <Claus.Kessel@t-online.de> wrote in message
news:3C193529.1B51D2C4@t-online.de...
> Hi
>
> I wrote an application that uses Oracle. The application
> connects/communicates with oracle via BDE ODBC .... It is very awkward
> to administrate the BDE and ODBC.
> Does an easier way exist to connect/communicate with Oracle?
> Is ADO easier? How many dll must I install, how many parameter set in
> ADO
>
> Is the BCB enterprise solution easier?
>
> Is it easier/possible to use with Oracle OLE class libs?
>
> --
> Mit freundlichen Gruessen, Best Regards
>
> Claus Kessel
> Software Entwicklung Beratung
> Haldenweg 8
> 88250 Weingarten
> Tel: +49 (0)751 - 44539
> Fax: +49 (0)751 - 48464
> email: claus.kessel@t-online.de
>
>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3c2c6e6f$1_2@dnews>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!priapus.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!netnews.com!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!dnews
References: <3C193529.1B51D2C4@t-online.de>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10698b,616d46b72e983a81
X-Google-Attributes: gid10698b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-28 05:14:42 PST
From: "Unwanted Edict" <unwantededict@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.database.ado
References: <3C193529.1B51D2C4@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: better solution then BDE/ODBC 
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 05:08:16 -0800
Lines: 45
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.160.39.91
Message-ID: <3c2c6e6f$1_2@dnews>
X-Trace: dnews 1009544815 64.160.39.91 (28 Dec 2001 05:06:55 -0800)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!priapus.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!netnews.com!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!dnews