Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.database.ado
Article #4614Re: BDE vs. ADO
From: Irongizon
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 18:42
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 18:42
52 lines
2967 bytes
2967 bytes
Hi Jeremy: I was working with BDE in C++ Builder for a year. Now I'm using ADO Components and I think is a good solution to many problems. With BDE, you have to install in the client machine the BDE. With ADO It`s all included in the client application. The BDE gives problems with some kind of databases: (MSAccess 2000, SQL Server).If you can't connect with any of this database you must use ODBC, and this is very slow. ADO gives solutions to all these problems. I'm using now ADO with Access 2000 and SQL Server and it goes very well and fastly. You will have to watch how works with ORACLE and other kind of Databases.It's a very easy way to move from a kind of database to another one. Ra�l. "Jeremy R. Wright" <jwright@zevex.com> escribi� en el mensaje news:3be816c8$1_2@dnews... > I thought I had seen some posts on this earlier but I couldn't find any. We > are about to start work on a huge redesign and upgrade on one of our > software projects, and there has been much discussion as to what database we > should use for our data. We're considering giving the user a choice between > Oracle, MS Access, and Paradox, but in order to do so, we need to use a > database engine that is reliable, robust, and efficient. We have used BDE in > the past simply because it came bundled with C++ builder, but we've had a > few small compatibility issues and heard of others having larger problems > (large BLOB fields getting corrupted, conflicts with WordPerfect, etc.). > > A colleague of mine mentioned using ADO. After a few searches on the web, I > still haven't come up with much that actually describes the pros and cons of > using ADO, especially in contrast with BDE. I figured C++ Builder and Delphi > users would know the most about this because many of you have used both. If > someone can point me in the right direction or provide me with some good > facts (or opinions), it would be greatly appreciated. > > Jeremy Wright > JTech Medical > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3be9809a$1_1@dnews>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!news.home.com!sjcppf01.usenetserver.com!usenetserver.com!newsfeeder.randori.com!out.nntp.be!propagator-SanJose!in.nntp.be!newsfeed01.tsnz.net!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!dnewsReferences:
<3be816c8$1_2@dnews>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 10698b,4aa5b65f163c98c2 X-Google-Attributes: gid10698b,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-07 10:47:35 PST From: "Irongizon" <grangizon@lycos.es> Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.database.ado References: <3be816c8$1_2@dnews> Subject: Re: BDE vs. ADO Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 19:42:43 +0100 Lines: 54 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.55.170.90 Message-ID: <3be9809a$1_1@dnews> X-Trace: dnews 1005158554 195.55.170.90 (7 Nov 2001 10:42:34 -0800) Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!news.home.com!sjcppf01.usenetserver.com!usenetserver.com!newsfeeder.randori.com!out.nntp.be!propagator-SanJose!in.nntp.be!newsfeed01.tsnz.net!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!dnews