Re: Another slant on the patch problem

Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.database.multi-tier

Article #1670

Back to borland.public.cppbuilder.database.multi-tier Previous Next

#1670

From: Mark Johnson
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 00:00

15 lines
1362 bytes

I sent in a bug report to Borland a couple of weeks ago along with the work
around.  The response I got from the person investigating the bug was "I
rebuilt empedit and it worked for me".  This would be the case if you don't
force the tlb editor to regenerate  the code.  This should have been
obvious.  I don't think this guy spent two minutes trying to solve the
problem.  And of course the resubmitted bug report goes to the end of the
queue.

John Graham <jgraham@salts.navy.mil> wrote in message
news:3796F0CB.48790F91@salts.navy.mil...
> however, I do expect it to work.  And I expect a factory created patch to
not
> cause problems that did not exist prior to the update.

I aggree.  I expected better from Borland.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <7n7t8f$n7f2@forums.borland.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <3791FB86.923BE652@salts.navy.mil> <7n6buq$la622@forums.borland.com> <3796F0CB.48790F91@salts.navy.mil>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fcd2b,e64518dbee1d18e6
X-Google-Attributes: gidfcd2b,public
From: "Mark Johnson" <mark@judocd.com>
Subject: Re: Another slant on the patch problem
Date: 1999/07/22
Message-ID: <7n7t8f$n7f2@forums.borland.com>
X-Deja-AN: 504130204
References: <3791FB86.923BE652@salts.navy.mil> <7n6buq$la622@forums.borland.com> <3796F0CB.48790F91@salts.navy.mil>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.database.multi-tier

Reply to Parent Message