Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.internet.socket
Article #170Re: VoIP implementation
From: Tom420
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 02:37
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 02:37
34 lines
2964 bytes
2964 bytes
Carl Danley wrote: > Alright... So, I've been reading a book for VoIP and have been wondering > whether or not I should even bother trying to implement a feature like > this into a program of mine... I was wondering if anyone on here would > be willing to work with me to help with creating some sample code so I > can understand the process in this language... I am decently experienced > with Codegear RAD Studio (C++) and write applications on a daily > basis... My understandings are that this isnt an easy task, but im tired > of hearing that and I want to learn this so that I can implement this > type of feature into a multitude of different applications. If you have > any ideas as to where I could get started or have some spare time to > write some sample coding, I would absolutely appreciate it! I have > posted on several different forums over the past year and no one has > helped at all.. Thank you again for your time! > > Also, if you have any questions, please ask! (read the other post first) Oh, and for the VoIP... Well you will never hear "forget it" from me, but let's say I had a peak at it a some moment and found that the whole protocol was very complicated, and looked messy to me. After some research, I decided never to make any experimentation regarding that, although I was very interested. As for compression/encryption, I'm not even remotely close to something that you would call an expert, but I have bases for having experimenting a lot around that when I was wrong. Let's just say that part of my enthusiasm went away when I received a letter from a lawyer requesting that I stop distributing my implementation of the LZ78 algorithm, which was, to the best of my judgment, a poor non optimized only good for educational purpose implementation. Tom :)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<486846e6$1@newsgroups.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder3.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!217.73.144.44.MISMATCH!feeder.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!194.25.134.126.MISMATCH!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<4868387c@newsgroups.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 11508e,be62032270e223aa X-Google-Attributes: gid11508e,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:37:17 -0400 From: Tom420 <tom420@sherbrooke.qc.ca> Reply-To: nospam@antispam.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.internet.socket Subject: Re: VoIP implementation References: <4868387c@newsgroups.borland.com> In-Reply-To: <4868387c@newsgroups.borland.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080629-0, 2008-06-29), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.131.11.65 Message-ID: <486846e6$1@newsgroups.borland.com> X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1214793446 66.131.11.65 (29 Jun 2008 19:37:26 -0700) Lines: 34 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder3.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!217.73.144.44.MISMATCH!feeder.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!194.25.134.126.MISMATCH!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail