🚀 go-pugleaf

Remy Lebeau (TeamB) wrote:

> The ContentType alone has no effect whatsoever on Indy's encoders.  They
> don't care about the ContentType at all.  The value is written to the header
> inside the message data and then ignored for everything else.

You mean the ContentType of TIdMessage here? (As every TIdText has its
own ContentType).

I can not confirm that.

Whatever I put as type Indy will neglect it and determine the type itself.
What I think is a good idea, because why should the use bother with a type?

So I do not put a value in.
I do not put in values for encoding either and was able
to send mails of the following types:

-text only
-text+html
-text+attachments
-text+html+attachments
-text+(html+graphic)
-text+(html+graphic)+attachments

For the latter: If I compose such an email with thunderbird i get:
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
      boundary="------------050109080305000709040803"
With Indy:
Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative";
      boundary="=_MoreStuf_...

And the structure of the mail is diferent.

The nice thing is that thunderbird. and also OE displaying
the eml, don't care.

It seems that they just look at 'Content-ID' and theron
promote an attachment to inlinegraphic.

Hans.



Hans.