🚀 go-pugleaf

I could compile Indy10 for CB6 using FullC6.bat file, I think it's 
possible to do this using FullC5.bat for CB5.
But after that you will get package that can be installed to builder, 
but you will get many problems with the indy hpp files for the real indy 
examples.

Ed wrote:
> http://www.indyproject.org/Sockets/Docs/Indy10Instal.en.html
> 
> 
> If open IndySystem with Builder, (step 1 of step 1), I get no project 
> compile options. I cannot compile. If I open Builder first, then open the 
> Delphi package file, I can compile but it is actually then a member of the 
> C++ Builder project (Project1), with Unit1.cpp added by Builder.  It may be 
> that I need to try the command line compiler? The words Open and compile led 
> me to believe that I should Open then in Builder.
> 
> Same result for step 2 of step 1 and step 3 of step 1.
> 
> As you can see there is  No step 2  under the Installation section.
>  Unless you count the two step ones...
> the first being to download the development snapshot.
> 
> 
> I thought it could explain why I cannot get step 3 to work. Or I am missing
> something obvious. I can just never end up with an installable C++ builder
> package
> as a result of those steps, so assumed I must be compiling wrong.
> Thank you for looking at my post!
> Ed
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Remy Lebeau (TeamB)" <no.spam@no.spam.com>
> Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.internet.socket
> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 9:49 AM
> Subject: Re: Builder 5 and Indy 10 source instructions
> 
> 
> 
>>"Ed" <enaillon@nvinet.com> wrote in message
>>news:43c7af9c$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
>>
>>
>>>I have found the installation from source instructions on the
>>>indyproject.org site very frustrating.
>>
>>How so?
>>
>>
>>>The site that deals with Indy10Install for BCB has 7 lines of
>>>non-specific instruction.
>>
>>Can you elaborate more?
>>
>>
>>>Step one says says Open and Compile four different delphi dpk files.
>>
>>What is non-specific about that?
>>
>>
>>>Are they opened a a new project?
>>
>>No.  DPK files are Delphi packages, just as BPK file are C++ packages.
>>Packages are their own projects, just as BPR file are their own C++
>>projects.
>>
>>
>>>Just compile the Unit?
>>
>>The DPK/BPK files are compilable as themselves.  They contain a list of
>>source units for the compiler to process.   They are like makefiles (but
>>not).
>>
>>
>>>Should the project be named anything in particular?
>>
>>You should not be making new projects to begin with.
>>
>>
>>>Should I name them with the bpk extension?
>>
>>Not unless you have created actual C++ packages.
>>
>>
>>>They are delphi package files
>>
>>Yes.
>>
>>
>>>so do not seem to be a valid package to Builder.
>>
>>BCB includes a command-line Delphi compiler, dcc32.exe, that can compile
>>DPK
>>files.
>>
>>
>>>Then step 3 says...(where the heck is step 2 guys? the page says step
>>>one...step  three.. )
>>
>>What page are you referring to exactly?
>>
>>
>>Gambit
>>
>>
> 
> 
> "Remy Lebeau (TeamB)" <no.spam@no.spam.com> wrote in message 
> news:43c7e795$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> 
>>"Ed" <enaillon@nvinet.com> wrote in message
>>news:43c7af9c$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
>>
>>
>>>I have found the installation from source instructions on the
>>>indyproject.org site very frustrating.
>>
>>How so?
>>
>>
>>>The site that deals with Indy10Install for BCB has 7 lines of
>>>non-specific instruction.
>>
>>Can you elaborate more?
>>
>>
>>>Step one says says Open and Compile four different delphi dpk files.
>>
>>What is non-specific about that?
>>
>>
>>>Are they opened a a new project?
>>
>>No.  DPK files are Delphi packages, just as BPK file are C++ packages.
>>Packages are their own projects, just as BPR file are their own C++
>>projects.
>>
>>
>>>Just compile the Unit?
>>
>>The DPK/BPK files are compilable as themselves.  They contain a list of
>>source units for the compiler to process.   They are like makefiles (but
>>not).
>>
>>
>>>Should the project be named anything in particular?
>>
>>You should not be making new projects to begin with.
>>
>>
>>>Should I name them with the bpk extension?
>>
>>Not unless you have created actual C++ packages.
>>
>>
>>>They are delphi package files
>>
>>Yes.
>>
>>
>>>so do not seem to be a valid package to Builder.
>>
>>BCB includes a command-line Delphi compiler, dcc32.exe, that can compile 
>>DPK
>>files.
>>
>>
>>>Then step 3 says...(where the heck is step 2 guys? the page says step
>>>one...step  three.. )
>>
>>What page are you referring to exactly?
>>
>>
>>Gambit
>>
>>
> 
> 
>