🚀 go-pugleaf

Thank you Vladimir, I did try the fullc5 bat file, before making any posts, 
and used that with the development snapshot.

It was error after error, there was a delphi project that needed to be 
compiled into an exe before the bat file would even run, then on and on from 
there.

So I tried the other method that I referred to, but they do not seem to work 
either. But in my case, perserverance often makes up for a lack of talent. 
Someday I will figure it out.
Ed
"Vladimir Zhuchko" <zhuchko@jinr.ru> wrote in message 
news:43c8cff3@newsgroups.borland.com...
>I could compile Indy10 for CB6 using FullC6.bat file, I think it's possible 
>to do this using FullC5.bat for CB5.
> But after that you will get package that can be installed to builder, but 
> you will get many problems with the indy hpp files for the real indy 
> examples.
>
> Ed wrote:
>> http://www.indyproject.org/Sockets/Docs/Indy10Instal.en.html
>>
>>
>> If open IndySystem with Builder, (step 1 of step 1), I get no project 
>> compile options. I cannot compile. If I open Builder first, then open the 
>> Delphi package file, I can compile but it is actually then a member of 
>> the C++ Builder project (Project1), with Unit1.cpp added by Builder.  It 
>> may be that I need to try the command line compiler? The words Open and 
>> compile led me to believe that I should Open then in Builder.
>>
>> Same result for step 2 of step 1 and step 3 of step 1.
>>
>> As you can see there is  No step 2  under the Installation section.
>>  Unless you count the two step ones...
>> the first being to download the development snapshot.
>>
>>
>> I thought it could explain why I cannot get step 3 to work. Or I am 
>> missing
>> something obvious. I can just never end up with an installable C++ 
>> builder
>> package
>> as a result of those steps, so assumed I must be compiling wrong.
>> Thank you for looking at my post!
>> Ed
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Remy Lebeau (TeamB)" <no.spam@no.spam.com>
>> Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.internet.socket
>> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 9:49 AM
>> Subject: Re: Builder 5 and Indy 10 source instructions
>>
>>
>>
>>>"Ed" <enaillon@nvinet.com> wrote in message
>>>news:43c7af9c$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>I have found the installation from source instructions on the
>>>>indyproject.org site very frustrating.
>>>
>>>How so?
>>>
>>>
>>>>The site that deals with Indy10Install for BCB has 7 lines of
>>>>non-specific instruction.
>>>
>>>Can you elaborate more?
>>>
>>>
>>>>Step one says says Open and Compile four different delphi dpk files.
>>>
>>>What is non-specific about that?
>>>
>>>
>>>>Are they opened a a new project?
>>>
>>>No.  DPK files are Delphi packages, just as BPK file are C++ packages.
>>>Packages are their own projects, just as BPR file are their own C++
>>>projects.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Just compile the Unit?
>>>
>>>The DPK/BPK files are compilable as themselves.  They contain a list of
>>>source units for the compiler to process.   They are like makefiles (but
>>>not).
>>>
>>>
>>>>Should the project be named anything in particular?
>>>
>>>You should not be making new projects to begin with.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Should I name them with the bpk extension?
>>>
>>>Not unless you have created actual C++ packages.
>>>
>>>
>>>>They are delphi package files
>>>
>>>Yes.
>>>
>>>
>>>>so do not seem to be a valid package to Builder.
>>>
>>>BCB includes a command-line Delphi compiler, dcc32.exe, that can compile
>>>DPK
>>>files.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Then step 3 says...(where the heck is step 2 guys? the page says step
>>>>one...step  three.. )
>>>
>>>What page are you referring to exactly?
>>>
>>>
>>>Gambit
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> "Remy Lebeau (TeamB)" <no.spam@no.spam.com> wrote in message 
>> news:43c7e795$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
>>
>>>"Ed" <enaillon@nvinet.com> wrote in message
>>>news:43c7af9c$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>I have found the installation from source instructions on the
>>>>indyproject.org site very frustrating.
>>>
>>>How so?
>>>
>>>
>>>>The site that deals with Indy10Install for BCB has 7 lines of
>>>>non-specific instruction.
>>>
>>>Can you elaborate more?
>>>
>>>
>>>>Step one says says Open and Compile four different delphi dpk files.
>>>
>>>What is non-specific about that?
>>>
>>>
>>>>Are they opened a a new project?
>>>
>>>No.  DPK files are Delphi packages, just as BPK file are C++ packages.
>>>Packages are their own projects, just as BPR file are their own C++
>>>projects.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Just compile the Unit?
>>>
>>>The DPK/BPK files are compilable as themselves.  They contain a list of
>>>source units for the compiler to process.   They are like makefiles (but
>>>not).
>>>
>>>
>>>>Should the project be named anything in particular?
>>>
>>>You should not be making new projects to begin with.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Should I name them with the bpk extension?
>>>
>>>Not unless you have created actual C++ packages.
>>>
>>>
>>>>They are delphi package files
>>>
>>>Yes.
>>>
>>>
>>>>so do not seem to be a valid package to Builder.
>>>
>>>BCB includes a command-line Delphi compiler, dcc32.exe, that can compile 
>>>DPK
>>>files.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Then step 3 says...(where the heck is step 2 guys? the page says step
>>>>one...step  three.. )
>>>
>>>What page are you referring to exactly?
>>>
>>>
>>>Gambit
>>>
>>>
>>
>>