🚀 go-pugleaf

On Wed, 18 May 2005 09:36:26 +0200, "Dirk Schnitzler" <dschnitzler at ac-magnetic dot de> wrote:

>> What you posted earlier were originally my words, not Don's.  He copied
>them
>>
>
>Does it really matter?
I'll second that

>If you know an "easy way" (for me as an amateur) to install Indy10,
>I would appreciate it.
Dont' waste your time at this point.  You will just get frustrated.

>>That fellow was me, and you apparently did not research the issue deep
>>enough, or else you would know that third-party BCB packages are already
>>floating around publically after that message was posted, and that people
>>have been able to install and use Indy 10 in BCB.
>
>Can you tell me where I (we) can find them?
I would like to know that one too.  As far as I can see, Indy 10 has the
same old problems and is still not supported with BCB6.  

In a thread from February:

>"John Borchers" <jborchers@notmail.com> wrote in message
>news:4210b934@newsgroups.borland.com...
>
>> IdWinSock2.hpp
>>
>> typedef TWSAProtocol_InfoW *LPWSAProtocol_InfoW;
>>
>> Error: E2257 , expected
>
>IdWinSock2.hpp is one of the main reasons why Indy 10 is not compatible with
>BCB yet.

Nothing has changed.  The errors are still the same now as it was then.
I have tried both the release 10.0.52 and development 10.0.85 and
get the same results.  where are these people who "have been able to 
install and use Indy 10 in BCB"?

Damon Register