Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.internet.socket
Article #4767Re: Borland Socket and Windows XP Firewall
From: Stefano Bonifazi
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 09:42
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 09:42
44 lines
2965 bytes
2965 bytes
Hi Mr Lebeau! For what Mr. Galema says I understand how much stupid is Microsoft XP Firewall ... I thought that after SP2, it was better :( It's not a good thing for Microsoft such a publicity from a great guru of developing :-) ... Maybe they will start to hire good programmers :) For me there's no matter ... I've never used a firewall ... what or who should I block? I'm only a student, no hacker would find interesting what I have in my PC ... I know that the only way to keep software protected at 100% is to keep it in a PC not linked to any LAN/Internet connection:) And It would take only few minutes for me to get another firewall if I ever wished .... The matter is another: many families will consider WinXP SP2 good enough for protecting their home PC, so shortly most of home PC will be running that "piece of junk" ... and as programmer I have to make my applications/service running in spite of it!!! THANKS Gambit! Please help me with the issue of the redirection of the standard input/output, that lack in the security keeps me scared ;( "Remy Lebeau (TeamB)" <no.spam@no.spam.com> ha scritto nel messaggio news:41d3253e$1@newsgroups.borland.com... > > "Hans Galema" <notused@notused.nl> wrote in message > news:41d319e6@newsgroups.borland.com... > >> This XP firewall is confusing as it spreaks about blocking internet > connections >> and then blocks LAN connections too. I wonder why it is not possible to >> configure blocking per networkadapter. For a networkadapter only �known� >> services can be blocked per adaptor. > > The XP native firewall is a piece of junk. Microsoft still has not > implemented it the proper way a firewall should be implemented. I highly > suggest that you disable the native firewall and use someone else's, such > as > ZoneAlarm or Norton. > > > Gambit > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<41d3cd81@newsgroups.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!transit.nntp.hccnet.nl!transit1.nntp.hccnet.nl!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!news-peer-test!btnet!newsfeed.bt.es!caladan.landsraad.net!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<41d2f50d@newsgroups.borland.com> <41d319e6@newsgroups.borland.com> <41d3253e$1@newsgroups.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 11508e,9ee26827a988748 X-Google-Attributes: gid11508e,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII From: "Stefano Bonifazi" <stefboombastic@email.it> Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.internet.socket References: <41d2f50d@newsgroups.borland.com> <41d319e6@newsgroups.borland.com> <41d3253e$1@newsgroups.borland.com> Subject: Re: Borland Socket and Windows XP Firewall Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:42:28 +0100 Lines: 46 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.24.174.29 Message-ID: <41d3cd81@newsgroups.borland.com> X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1104399745 151.24.174.29 (30 Dec 2004 01:42:25 -0800) Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!transit.nntp.hccnet.nl!transit1.nntp.hccnet.nl!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!news-peer-test!btnet!newsfeed.bt.es!caladan.landsraad.net!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail