🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.internet.socket
Article #4767

Re: Borland Socket and Windows XP Firewall

#4767
From: Stefano Bonifazi
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 09:42
44 lines
2965 bytes
Hi Mr Lebeau!
 For what Mr. Galema says I understand how much stupid is Microsoft XP 
Firewall ...
I thought that after SP2, it was better :(
It's not a good thing for Microsoft such a publicity from a great guru of 
developing :-) ... Maybe they will start to hire good programmers :)
 For me there's no matter ... I've never used a firewall ... what or who 
should I block? I'm only a student, no hacker would find interesting what I 
have in my PC ... I know that the only way to keep software protected at 
100% is to keep it in a PC not linked to any LAN/Internet connection:)
And It would take only few minutes for me to get another firewall if I ever 
wished ....
The matter is another: many families will consider WinXP SP2 good enough for 
protecting their home PC, so shortly most of home PC will be running that 
"piece of junk" ... and as programmer I have to make my applications/service 
running in spite of it!!!

THANKS Gambit!
Please help me with the issue of the redirection of the standard 
input/output, that lack in the security keeps me scared ;(


"Remy Lebeau (TeamB)" <no.spam@no.spam.com> ha scritto nel messaggio 
news:41d3253e$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
>
> "Hans Galema" <notused@notused.nl> wrote in message
> news:41d319e6@newsgroups.borland.com...
>
>> This XP firewall is confusing as it spreaks about blocking internet
> connections
>> and then blocks LAN connections too. I wonder why it is not possible to
>> configure blocking per networkadapter. For a networkadapter only �known�
>> services can be blocked per adaptor.
>
> The XP native firewall is a piece of junk.  Microsoft still has not
> implemented it the proper way a firewall should be implemented.  I highly
> suggest that you disable the native firewall and use someone else's, such 
> as
> ZoneAlarm or Norton.
>
>
> Gambit
>
> 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <41d3cd81@newsgroups.borland.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!transit.nntp.hccnet.nl!transit1.nntp.hccnet.nl!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!news-peer-test!btnet!newsfeed.bt.es!caladan.landsraad.net!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail
References: <41d2f50d@newsgroups.borland.com> <41d319e6@newsgroups.borland.com> <41d3253e$1@newsgroups.borland.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 11508e,9ee26827a988748
X-Google-Attributes: gid11508e,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
From: "Stefano Bonifazi" <stefboombastic@email.it>
Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.internet.socket
References: <41d2f50d@newsgroups.borland.com> <41d319e6@newsgroups.borland.com> <41d3253e$1@newsgroups.borland.com>
Subject: Re: Borland Socket and Windows XP Firewall
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:42:28 +0100
Lines: 46
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.24.174.29
Message-ID: <41d3cd81@newsgroups.borland.com>
X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1104399745 151.24.174.29 (30 Dec 2004 01:42:25 -0800)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!transit.nntp.hccnet.nl!transit1.nntp.hccnet.nl!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!news-peer-test!btnet!newsfeed.bt.es!caladan.landsraad.net!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail