indy or tnmftp? (bcb 6.0)

Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.internet.socket

Article #5104

Back to borland.public.cppbuilder.internet.socket Previous Next

#5104

From: Fabrice
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:05

10 lines
1051 bytes

Hi

Is it better to use tnmft or indy in 9.0 with bcb 6.0?

I had a lot of problem with tnmftp in bcb 5.0 (bug in list method or
connected status is not always correct)

Thanks

Fabrice

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4173874c@newsgroups.borland.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!213.200.89.82.MISMATCH!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 11508e,97842452bd164753,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid11508e,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: "Fabrice" <f.marcantuoni@splin-rd.com>
Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.internet.socket
Subject: indy or tnmftp?  (bcb 6.0)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:05:15 +0200
Lines: 12
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.78.199.158
Message-ID: <4173874c@newsgroups.borland.com>
X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1098090316 194.78.199.158 (18 Oct 2004 02:05:16 -0700)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!213.200.89.82.MISMATCH!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail