🚀 go-pugleaf

Thanks for the Info, Joe, but I am getting the feeling that I should drop 
back
to the Indy 9 version.  Our life is complex enough with 1300 units of code
in our application.  I would rather get a stable working product available
for internal testing and then for release to customers before adding
another straw to the camels back.  I did watch that "Your code is c.r.a.p."
video after all.  LOL


"Joe Pasquariello" <joep@fenway.com> wrote in message 
news:4783da25$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> Larry,
>
> Take a look at the thread labeled "Update Indy10 in C++ Builder 2007"
> (roladdon, 12/16/2007) in this newsgroup. The author of that post has been
> able to install the updated version of Indy10, and he has posted his batch
> files for deleting files and building the new version. Toward the bottom 
> of
> the thread there are two messages from roladdon that contain batch files 
> for
> 1) backing up and removing the old version and 2) building and installing 
> a
> new version. I haven't been able to get it to work yet. If you try it,
> please let us know your experience and any tips if you do get it to work. 
> It
> would be a big help to everyone if a documented and tested installation
> procedure could be produced.
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> "Larry Griffiths" <nospame@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:4783c49f@newsgroups.borland.com...
>> What does "C++ Enabled" mean?
>> Also, what does "Stable" mean?
>>
>> I am in a pinch because I am on the new BDS2007 compiler and have a robot
>> interface for a customer that I need to get working again in a week or 
>> so.
>> I converted the code to the Indy 10 but have not been able to get a 
>> socket
>> connection yet.
>>
>> Thanks for your quick reply, Gambit.
>>
>> Larry Griffiths.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Remy Lebeau (TeamB)" <no.spam@no.spam.com> wrote in message
>> news:4783b9a6$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
>> >
>> > "Larry Griffiths" <nospame@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>> > news:47839343$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
>> >
>> >> Are you sure about the "Or the one that shipped with RAD 2007,
>> >> for that matter, as it is the same as the BDS 2006 release" you made?
>> >
>> > Yes, I am sure.  The Indy team could not get a new stable version ready
> in
>> > time for RAD 2007's release, so CodeGear shipped RAD 2007 with the same
>> > Indy 10 release that shipped with BDS 2006.  That older Indy release 
>> > was
>> > not C++-enabled.  If you are able to use it in C++, then good for you,
> but
>> > you are still using an outdated version of Indy anyway.
>> >
>> >
>> > Gambit
>> >
>>
>>
>
>