🚀 go-pugleaf

Hi Larry,

I have to agree with you. I may do the same, despite the additional
capabilities of Indy10. Perhaps in the next release of RAD (2008?), there
will be a stable version of Indy10.

Joe


"Larry Griffiths" <nospame@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:4783e6da$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> Thanks for the Info, Joe, but I am getting the feeling that I should drop
> back
> to the Indy 9 version.  Our life is complex enough with 1300 units of code
> in our application.  I would rather get a stable working product available
> for internal testing and then for release to customers before adding
> another straw to the camels back.  I did watch that "Your code is
c.r.a.p."
> video after all.  LOL
>
>
> "Joe Pasquariello" <joep@fenway.com> wrote in message
> news:4783da25$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> > Larry,
> >
> > Take a look at the thread labeled "Update Indy10 in C++ Builder 2007"
> > (roladdon, 12/16/2007) in this newsgroup. The author of that post has
been
> > able to install the updated version of Indy10, and he has posted his
batch
> > files for deleting files and building the new version. Toward the bottom
> > of
> > the thread there are two messages from roladdon that contain batch files
> > for
> > 1) backing up and removing the old version and 2) building and
installing
> > a
> > new version. I haven't been able to get it to work yet. If you try it,
> > please let us know your experience and any tips if you do get it to
work.
> > It
> > would be a big help to everyone if a documented and tested installation
> > procedure could be produced.
> >
> > Joe
> >
> >
> >
> > "Larry Griffiths" <nospame@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> > news:4783c49f@newsgroups.borland.com...
> >> What does "C++ Enabled" mean?
> >> Also, what does "Stable" mean?
> >>
> >> I am in a pinch because I am on the new BDS2007 compiler and have a
robot
> >> interface for a customer that I need to get working again in a week or
> >> so.
> >> I converted the code to the Indy 10 but have not been able to get a
> >> socket
> >> connection yet.
> >>
> >> Thanks for your quick reply, Gambit.
> >>
> >> Larry Griffiths.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "Remy Lebeau (TeamB)" <no.spam@no.spam.com> wrote in message
> >> news:4783b9a6$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> >> >
> >> > "Larry Griffiths" <nospame@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> >> > news:47839343$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> >> >
> >> >> Are you sure about the "Or the one that shipped with RAD 2007,
> >> >> for that matter, as it is the same as the BDS 2006 release" you
made?
> >> >
> >> > Yes, I am sure.  The Indy team could not get a new stable version
ready
> > in
> >> > time for RAD 2007's release, so CodeGear shipped RAD 2007 with the
same
> >> > Indy 10 release that shipped with BDS 2006.  That older Indy release
> >> > was
> >> > not C++-enabled.  If you are able to use it in C++, then good for
you,
> > but
> >> > you are still using an outdated version of Indy anyway.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Gambit
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>