🚀 go-pugleaf

Well, we are back on Indy 9 under BDS2007 and I tested my new interface with 
a new Pharmacy dispensing robot that a customer will be using shortly.

If I remember correctly I ead about a problem in QC that I think was about 
"Fatal Linker error" and it suggested that Indy 10 might be the cause of it.

http://qc.borland.com/wc/qcmain.aspx?d=39596

Larry Griffiths


"Joe Pasquariello" <joep@fenway.com> wrote in message 
news:4784ff69$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> Hi Larry,
>
> I have to agree with you. I may do the same, despite the additional
> capabilities of Indy10. Perhaps in the next release of RAD (2008?), there
> will be a stable version of Indy10.
>
> Joe
>
>
> "Larry Griffiths" <nospame@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:4783e6da$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
>> Thanks for the Info, Joe, but I am getting the feeling that I should drop
>> back
>> to the Indy 9 version.  Our life is complex enough with 1300 units of 
>> code
>> in our application.  I would rather get a stable working product 
>> available
>> for internal testing and then for release to customers before adding
>> another straw to the camels back.  I did watch that "Your code is
> c.r.a.p."
>> video after all.  LOL
>>
>>
>> "Joe Pasquariello" <joep@fenway.com> wrote in message
>> news:4783da25$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
>> > Larry,
>> >
>> > Take a look at the thread labeled "Update Indy10 in C++ Builder 2007"
>> > (roladdon, 12/16/2007) in this newsgroup. The author of that post has
> been
>> > able to install the updated version of Indy10, and he has posted his
> batch
>> > files for deleting files and building the new version. Toward the 
>> > bottom
>> > of
>> > the thread there are two messages from roladdon that contain batch 
>> > files
>> > for
>> > 1) backing up and removing the old version and 2) building and
> installing
>> > a
>> > new version. I haven't been able to get it to work yet. If you try it,
>> > please let us know your experience and any tips if you do get it to
> work.
>> > It
>> > would be a big help to everyone if a documented and tested installation
>> > procedure could be produced.
>> >
>> > Joe
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "Larry Griffiths" <nospame@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>> > news:4783c49f@newsgroups.borland.com...
>> >> What does "C++ Enabled" mean?
>> >> Also, what does "Stable" mean?
>> >>
>> >> I am in a pinch because I am on the new BDS2007 compiler and have a
> robot
>> >> interface for a customer that I need to get working again in a week or
>> >> so.
>> >> I converted the code to the Indy 10 but have not been able to get a
>> >> socket
>> >> connection yet.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for your quick reply, Gambit.
>> >>
>> >> Larry Griffiths.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "Remy Lebeau (TeamB)" <no.spam@no.spam.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:4783b9a6$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
>> >> >
>> >> > "Larry Griffiths" <nospame@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>> >> > news:47839343$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
>> >> >
>> >> >> Are you sure about the "Or the one that shipped with RAD 2007,
>> >> >> for that matter, as it is the same as the BDS 2006 release" you
> made?
>> >> >
>> >> > Yes, I am sure.  The Indy team could not get a new stable version
> ready
>> > in
>> >> > time for RAD 2007's release, so CodeGear shipped RAD 2007 with the
> same
>> >> > Indy 10 release that shipped with BDS 2006.  That older Indy release
>> >> > was
>> >> > not C++-enabled.  If you are able to use it in C++, then good for
> you,
>> > but
>> >> > you are still using an outdated version of Indy anyway.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Gambit
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>