🚀 go-pugleaf

Colin B Maharaj escreveu:
> 
> Yes it should, however I do things differently now.
> 
> Firstly I do not use thus timeout anymore.
> 
> I wrote some code where recv waits forever,
> then populates a string when data comes in
> and if one of the chars is a linefeed
> I trigger an event like this......
> 
> SetEvent(GotData);
> 
> where
> 
> HANDLE GotData = CreateEvent(NULL, false, false, NULL);
> 
> Then when I read a string, I do like this....
> 
> bool Timeout=false;
> AnsiString  __fastcall MySockets::ReadLn(int timeoutms)
> {
>   AnsiString A = "";
>   DWORD ret=WaitForSingleObject(GotData, timeoutms);
>   if (ret==WAIT_TIMEOUT) { Timeout=true; return A; }
>   if (ret==WAIT_OBJECT_0)
>   {
>     <PSEUDOCODE> A = ExtractData() </PSEUDOCODE>
>     return A;
>   }
>   return A; // maybe some other error....
> }
> 

hum...
I don't now if this aproach work on my application...

I download many html pages in a specific order, one after one...
They are different html, that depends on the results of the last.

Of course that will work... But I think that use timeout to determine if 
I need to restart is more simple... I'll try the firs option...

But I'll think in a way to use this... The problem is that I need 
"extreme" velocity, and I don't know if work with events is a good idea 
in this case...

Anyway, much thanks! =D