Killing-Disconnecting all Peers in a TIdTCPServer

Thread View: borland.public.cppbuilder.internet.socket

4 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

4 total messages Started by McKool Fri, 25 Jun 2004 07:07

#5625

Author: McKool
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 07:07

16 lines
1803 bytes

Hello.  I have some problems with Peer disconnection and ThreadTimeOuts.  I
want to make a general disconnection from a server application.  In the
moment a put the propertie "Active" from the server to false and hide the
exception of ThreadTimeOut.  It's work but the problem is after do that.
Then i can not put the server again to "active = true" because its throughts
the same ThreadTimeOut exception each time that i try to  do it.  Making a
Sleep(1000) after the first exception (active = false), and before to try to
active the server again, make the server work again, but I'm only wondering
if is there a "clean" way to reset the server or something like that, or
better... a standard way to make a general disconnection of Clients (without
wait for the client confirmation of disconnect - I only want to cancel the
active peers in order to shutdown the server and restart it with a new port
number).

Thanks in advance.
KW

Re: Killing-Disconnecting all Peers in a TIdTCPServer

#5647

Author: Remy Lebeau (TeamB)
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:35

16 lines
1455 bytes

"McKool" <kenethw@peak-system.com> wrote in message
news:40dbcef7@newsgroups.borland.com...

> Hello.  I have some problems with Peer disconnection and
> ThreadTimeOuts. I want to make a general disconnection
> from a server application.  In the moment a put the propertie
> "Active" from the server to false and hide the exception of
> ThreadTimeOut.

Do your threads use the Synchronize() method at all?  The Active property
has a known timeout problem with threads calling Synchronize() while the
Active poperty is being assigned.


Gambit

Re: Killing-Disconnecting all Peers in a TIdTCPServer

#5649

Author: McKool
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:37

23 lines
1770 bytes

Yes, i use Synchronize but this problem comes even without enter in a
synchronize function.

"Remy Lebeau (TeamB)" <gambit47.no.spam@no.spam.yahoo.com> schrieb im
Newsbeitrag news:40e1f01e$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
>
> "McKool" <kenethw@peak-system.com> wrote in message
> news:40dbcef7@newsgroups.borland.com...
>
> > Hello.  I have some problems with Peer disconnection and
> > ThreadTimeOuts. I want to make a general disconnection
> > from a server application.  In the moment a put the propertie
> > "Active" from the server to false and hide the exception of
> > ThreadTimeOut.
>
> Do your threads use the Synchronize() method at all?  The Active property
> has a known timeout problem with threads calling Synchronize() while the
> Active poperty is being assigned.
>
>
> Gambit
>
>

Re: Killing-Disconnecting all Peers in a TIdTCPServer

#5651

Author: Remy Lebeau (TeamB)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:16

11 lines
1206 bytes

"McKool" <kenethw@peak-system.com> wrote in message
news:40e2a5bf@newsgroups.borland.com...

> Yes, i use Synchronize but this problem comes
> even without enter in a synchronize function.

Please show your actual code.


Gambit

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads