Re: CGI DLL vs dot net

Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.internet.web

Article #1243

Back to borland.public.cppbuilder.internet.web Previous Next

#1243

From: Hans Galema
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:35

11 lines
1271 bytes

Emmanuel wrote:
> I want to ask which is better in the performance for CGI Dll and Dot Net?

Don't understand your question. Which -and how many- things
are you comparing here ?

> somebody claim that CGI is as bad as ASP , is there real?

What do you mean with ASP ? Like .exe, .php and .pl also .asp is cgi.

Hans.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <424aab8e@newsgroups.borland.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail

References: <424a851b$1@newsgroups.borland.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: feeec,13252174d5b2a3f7
X-Google-Attributes: gidfeeec,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:35:07 +0200
From: Hans Galema <notused@notused.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.internet.web
Subject: Re: CGI DLL vs dot net
References: <424a851b$1@newsgroups.borland.com>
In-Reply-To: <424a851b$1@newsgroups.borland.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.125.201.248
Message-ID: <424aab8e@newsgroups.borland.com>
X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1112189838 129.125.201.248 (30 Mar 2005 05:37:18 -0800)
Lines: 11
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail

Reply to Parent Message