Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.internet.web
Article #1248Re: CGI DLL vs dot net
From: JJ
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:17
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:17
26 lines
1931 bytes
1931 bytes
I've used both. And as for performance, I belief when we are talking about online, enterprise applications, this topic is almost errellelavant. In this type of application, most of your performance bottleneck will likely be confined to your IO tasks(DB/File, Connections, and etc...). With that said, If I were you, I would concentrate on the functionality, stability, flexibility, and scalability rather than performance. I believe there's a place for every programming language. Your challenge is to select the most appropriate one for your project/task. Just for your gradification(not as a suggestion or recommendation), .NET (similar to java and JIT) will compile to native code(this will take couple steps though). So what can you lose. Good luck Jeff www.ruamkwamkid.com "Emmanuel" <emmanuel@erphk.com> wrote in message news:424a851b$1@newsgroups.borland.com... >I want to ask which is better in the performance for CGI Dll and Dot Net? > somebody claim that CGI is as bad as ASP , is there real? > > Thank you > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<424c30b0$1@newsgroups.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<424a851b$1@newsgroups.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: feeec,13252174d5b2a3f7 X-Google-Attributes: gidfeeec,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: "JJ" <mangpoh_007@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.internet.web References: <424a851b$1@newsgroups.borland.com> Subject: Re: CGI DLL vs dot net Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:17:45 -0700 Lines: 28 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.215.215.240 Message-ID: <424c30b0$1@newsgroups.borland.com> X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1112289456 65.215.215.240 (31 Mar 2005 09:17:36 -0800) Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail