🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 19:48:55 -0700, "Remy Lebeau \(TeamB\)"
<gambit47.no.spam@no.spam.yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>"Giuliano" <gcardinali@remove.adhoc.net> wrote in message
>news:nucvb0lqi70qn3vakejidh82d0htl0cdft@4ax.com...
>
>> Really?
>> What if I would like to create a modified JPEG from another JPEG?
>
>Without seeing TJPEGImage's actual source code (which Borland does not
>distribute) I would image that it is able to do a direct copy without any
>lose of data.
>

How your reply is related to my statement you have quoted?
Again, what if I would like to create a modified JPEG from another JPEG?
"A Modified JPEG", you understand this simple concept, sir?
Oppure te lo devo spiegare in un'altra lingua?

>> This how my original snipped was conceived.
>
>Your original code was assigning the JPG to a BMP and then assigning the BMP
>back to the JPG again.

Ohhh, really??? If you had not said to me this, really I wouldn't been able to
understand how my code works. Thanks, you are great. Many thanks, Finally I
have known as, the snippet I've conceived, it works.
Again, What if I would like to create a modified JPEG from another JPEG?
Del resto, come si dice, <<il Cavalier di Lapalisse, era vivo prima che
morisse>>. O no?

This thread has resolved only to a time loss. My life is too short to waste
time in this manner.

Giuliano