Re: LPCSTR

Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi

Article #10084

Back to borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi Previous Next

#10084

From: Ed Mulroy [TeamB]
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 07:05

14 lines
1402 bytes

const char* for LPCSTR
char * for LPSTR

I don't see a reason to use LPCSTR in Windows code.  I use const char
*.

.  Ed

> Sten Larsson wrote in message
> news:7q66a01vald1j2ckj6ghu88ud9c9rim712@4ax.com...
>
> Is there any good reason to use LPCSTR rathter than
> char*.... I really dislike using Win specific data types
> in generic code.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <40a31e61$1@newsgroups.borland.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!controlnews3.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!38.144.126.70.MISMATCH!feed3.newsreader.com!newsreader.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail

References: <7q66a01vald1j2ckj6ghu88ud9c9rim712@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10cc67,87911e32b3c1490e
X-Google-Attributes: gid10cc67,public
From: "Ed Mulroy [TeamB]" <dont_email_me@bitbuc.ket>
Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi
References: <7q66a01vald1j2ckj6ghu88ud9c9rim712@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: LPCSTR 
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 03:05:47 -0400
Lines: 16
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.74.175.102
Message-ID: <40a31e61$1@newsgroups.borland.com>
X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1084431969 24.74.175.102 (13 May 2004 00:06:09 -0700)
X-Authenticated-User: edmulroy
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!controlnews3.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!38.144.126.70.MISMATCH!feed3.newsreader.com!newsreader.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail

Reply to Parent Message