Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi
Article #10090Re: LPCSTR
From: Thomas Maeder [TeamB]
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 17:12
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 17:12
6 lines
1179 bytes
1179 bytes
Sten Larsson <s_t_enX@Xs_ten_l.com> writes: > Is there any good reason to use LPCSTR rathter than char*.... I really > dislike using Win specific data types in generic code. It's certainly good for code obfuscation. :-)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<m2ad0c45f1.fsf@madbox2.local>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!controlnews3.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.frii.net!newsfeed.frii.net!news.compaq.com!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<7q66a01vald1j2ckj6ghu88ud9c9rim712@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10cc67,87911e32b3c1490e X-Google-Attributes: gid10cc67,public Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi Subject: Re: LPCSTR References: <7q66a01vald1j2ckj6ghu88ud9c9rim712@4ax.com> From: maeder@glue.ch (Thomas Maeder [TeamB]) Organization: TeamB Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 19:12:50 +0200 Message-ID: <m2ad0c45f1.fsf@madbox2.local> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:jYkGWuee0RdNuGSJJPCDaT/TbrQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.218.10.26 X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1084468376 80.218.10.26 (13 May 2004 10:12:56 -0700) Lines: 6 X-Authenticated-User: tmaeder Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!controlnews3.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.frii.net!newsfeed.frii.net!news.compaq.com!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail