Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi
Article #12485Re: Windows Printers
From: Bob Gonder
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 21:51
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 21:51
17 lines
2203 bytes
2203 bytes
John Scott wrote: >I wonder if this stuff is necessary. If the printer has the duplex >capability and it is enabled then why would I need to use this process to >change the setting - it will already be enabled! Because not every print job needs/wants to print on both sides. If duplex were the default, then for instance, invoices (which know nothing about duplex, and so won't clear it) would print on both sides, and it would be kinda hard to seperate the two invoices. And, what if the user forgets to set Duplex before printing (or reset it after)? If they forget before, they waste cards. If they forget after...well....you won't be very well liked. If you don't manipulate the duplex setting, you do so at your user's peril.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<tvr9tv4cctvuri7np179a37t666i9m1s5u@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newspeer1.nwr.nac.net!colt.net!peernews3.colt.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<3fc7e524$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3fca2474@newsgroups.borland.com> <3fcb2567$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3fcb6984@newsgroups.borland.com> <goumsvolftvangoh1n8i7ktptavi57ut2d@4ax.com> <dsvmsvo53afn3qqk6p2ir6ld5lldimucju@4ax.com> <3fcb93d8@newsgroups.borland.com> <eipnsvs99q92prau97tl685lua6crv6e92@4ax.com> <3fce1fed@newsgroups.borland.com> <eudssvci6j3q0l82ivvfs5oj3i2rn1c5ct@4ax.com> <3fcf5268$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3fd4b3a4@newsgroups.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10cc67,7b2449597708bec X-Google-Attributes: gid10cc67,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-12-08 14:09:53 PST From: Bob Gonder <notbg@notmindspring.invalid> Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi Subject: Re: Windows Printers Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 13:51:22 -0800 Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc. Reply-To: notbg@notmindspring.invalid Message-ID: <tvr9tv4cctvuri7np179a37t666i9m1s5u@4ax.com> References: <3fc7e524$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3fca2474@newsgroups.borland.com> <3fcb2567$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3fcb6984@newsgroups.borland.com> <goumsvolftvangoh1n8i7ktptavi57ut2d@4ax.com> <dsvmsvo53afn3qqk6p2ir6ld5lldimucju@4ax.com> <3fcb93d8@newsgroups.borland.com> <eipnsvs99q92prau97tl685lua6crv6e92@4ax.com> <3fce1fed@newsgroups.borland.com> <eudssvci6j3q0l82ivvfs5oj3i2rn1c5ct@4ax.com> <3fcf5268$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3fd4b3a4@newsgroups.borland.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.31.165.104 X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1070920286 67.31.165.104 (8 Dec 2003 13:51:26 -0700) Lines: 19 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newspeer1.nwr.nac.net!colt.net!peernews3.colt.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail