🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi
Article #13251

Re: BHO question

#13251
From: Martin C
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:56
54 lines
4015 bytes
Remy,

"Remy Lebeau (TeamB)" <gambit47.no.spam@no.spam.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3f95e02e$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> I do not think you listened to what I tried to explain to you, so let me
try
> it make it ever more clear for you.  Did you, or did you not, use my
> original sample code regarding DISPID_NEWWINDOW2 in your own project?  Yes
> or no?
> If yes, then you will never get a new window *unless* you hold down either
> the CTRL or SHIFT key, as that is specifically how the example code was
> written to work.  If you did not hold down a key, then you would not get a
> new window.  You said yourself that the problem was solved once you
removed
> my code, which suggests that you were, in fact, using the original sample
> code as-is, including the code that checks the keyboard for CTRL or SHIFT
> being held down.

Yes remy I used it and when I realized what you were doing I removed your
DISPID_NEWWINDOW2 code, although the problem of (Open in new window) command
still exist.

> > My bho code now is blocking 100% of pop-up screens, my actual
> > problems is not in blocking pop-up screens, but :
> > 1- If the user tried to open any link using mouse right click and select
> > (Open in a new window) the IE will not respond
>
> If you are blocking 100% of the windows, then of course it won't do
> anything.

That is not correct...even if you are blocking 100% of pop-up screens (and
what I mean here by pop-up screens is screens that pop-up without the user
permission) there is a code (unfortunatly it is in VC) that can be written
to see if the newly created windows was created based on user selection (in
other words the user clicked on a link, picture...etc.) then the new window
will be created without blocking it, please review
(http://www.codeproject.com/atl/PopupBlocker2.asp)

> > 2- If the user clicked on a picture, link...etc. by left mouse click
> > and this picture, link...etc was suppose to open a new window, this
> > window will be killed as if it was a pop up screen.
>
> Again, if you are blocking 100% of the windows, then that is expected
> behavior as well.

Again please review (http://www.codeproject.com/atl/PopupBlocker2.asp)

>
> Gambit
>

Finally Remy, I really appreciate you helping me from day.

BR
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3f967065@newsgroups.borland.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail
References: <3f84957c@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f84a0b8@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f88b9db@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f88be72$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f897b9a@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f89c56f$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f8af683@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f8af95a$3@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f8affad@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f8b009f$3@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f8ed9f0$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f8edeb3$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f93f0e3@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f941ba4$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f9472ab@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f94782e$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f9487b0@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f94933e$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f949421$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f9496e6$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f9565e3@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f9570dd@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f95da49@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f95e02e$1@newsgroups.borland.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10cc67,15b7dd6889830f4f
X-Google-Attributes: gid10cc67,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-22 05:10:31 PST
From: "Martin C" <martinc@aol.com>
Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi
References: <3f84957c@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f84a0b8@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f88b9db@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f88be72$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f897b9a@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f89c56f$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f8af683@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f8af95a$3@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f8affad@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f8b009f$3@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f8ed9f0$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f8edeb3$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f93f0e3@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f941ba4$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f9472ab@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f94782e$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f9487b0@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f94933e$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f949421$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f9496e6$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f9565e3@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f9570dd@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f95da49@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f95e02e$1@newsgroups.borland.com>
Subject: Re: BHO question
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 03:56:19 -0800
Lines: 56
Organization: V Safe
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.135.27.219
Message-ID: <3f967065@newsgroups.borland.com>
X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1066823781 62.135.27.219 (22 Oct 2003 04:56:21 -0700)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail