Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi
Article #13837Re: alignment
From: Antonio Farfan
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:01
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:01
94 lines
3281 bytes
3281 bytes
This my definition of the struct:
The track is lost in the field of fProfileSettings. When I accesed to this
field i cant �t get the correct value. I suppose that there are
displacemente in the
address of access.
TPS_Settings;
typedef struct
{
unsigned __int8 fBackLight;//:0
__int8 fContrast;
__int8 fIdle;
__int8 fGreeting; file://:3
__int8 fAnimation;
__int8 fLaunchUp;
__int8 fLaunchDown;
__int8 fLaunchLeft;
__int8 fLaunchRight;
__int8 fLanguageLocale;
__int8 fGreetingType;
char
fCustomGreetingText[12+1];//kCustomGreetingLength
__int8 fPhoneLockState;//:25
__int8 fAutoLockState;
__int8 fWebGuardState;
__int8 fUseMEPhonebook;
__int8 fNetworkSelectionMode;
__int8 fAnyKeyAnswerState;
__int8 fAutoAnswerState;
__int8 fAutoRedialState;
__int8 fMinuteMinderState;
unsigned __int8 fNumbeForegin[20];
TSettings fProfileSettings [1];
__int8 fAudioProfileSelectionState;
alarmRecord fAlarmRecord;
}TPS_Settings;
struct alarmRecord
{
unsigned __int32 when;
Boolean alarmSet;
Boolean alarmRegistered;
AlarmFire frequency;
AlarmScreen alarmType;
char alarmString[MAX_STRING_ALARM];
};
struct TSettings
{
__int8 fModeState;
__int8 fAscendingState;
__int8 fToneState;
char fAudio[14];
};
"Remy Lebeau (TeamB)" <gambit47@yahoo.com> escribi� en el mensaje
news:3f676a91@newsgroups.borland.com...
>
> "Antonio Farfan" <amfm0777@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3f6749b2$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
>
> > // TPS_Settings is one struct defined in a file .h . It has the
> > same struct that it is keeping in memory
> > // I define this struct the same way that in the memory
>
> What is the actual declaration for TPS_Settings? That is an important
> detail that you have left out.
>
>
> Gambit
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/03
>
>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3f688407@newsgroups.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-09!supernews.com!newshosting.com!news-xfer2.atl.newshosting.com!63.218.45.203.MISMATCH!newsfeeds.sol.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<3f673746@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f674494$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f6749b2$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f676a91@newsgroups.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 10cc67,a9334a47483d8c0e X-Google-Attributes: gid10cc67,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-09-17 09:12:01 PST From: "Antonio Farfan" <amfm0777@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi References: <3f673746@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f674494$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f6749b2$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3f676a91@newsgroups.borland.com> Subject: Re: alignment Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 18:01:43 +0200 Lines: 96 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.15.230.33 Message-ID: <3f688407@newsgroups.borland.com> X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1063814151 62.15.230.33 (17 Sep 2003 08:55:51 -0700) Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-09!supernews.com!newshosting.com!news-xfer2.atl.newshosting.com!63.218.45.203.MISMATCH!newsfeeds.sol.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail