🚀 go-pugleaf

To my mind there is not a force inline function because if so i would
violate the meaning.
Inlines are only useful where no dynamic code is needed.

For instance while, for, do while, switch generate code which depends on
their expression.

while( int i=1 < x=100) differs from while( int i=1 < x=1000)

Another qualifier which breaks the inline qualifier is return because return
returns a value to the caller.
In Assembler it would be not the same if the function is called twice.

In addition there is not a cost/benefit decision it depends on the
expressions within the functions.




"Chris" <Chris8852@adelphia.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3ee19817$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> Microsoft VC++ has 'inline' and '__forceinline'.. 'inline' doesn't always
> create an inline function, it does a cost/benefit analysis first. Both
> inline in BCB and __forceinline in MSVC++ have cases where they can't
expand
> inline. I'm wondering if in BCB, inline uses a cost/benefit analysis, or
> just (tries) to force it? If it uses cost/benefit analysis, then how can I
> (try to) force it?
>
>