Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi
Article #15925Re: Behavior of inline
From: Chris
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 18:03
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 18:03
7 lines
1397 bytes
1397 bytes
I don't see why in Microsoft's VC++ that they would have a forceinline then. It seems to bypass the cost/benefit analysis period, and it says there definitely is one, and I'm not sure how it does it. I still don't understand the behavior of inline in BCB as compared to Microsoft's VC++. For example, is inline in BCB equivelant to inline in Microsoft VC++? If so, then there is no equivelant to forceinline?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3ee37a56$1@newsgroups.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-09!supernews.com!newshosting.com!news-xfer1.atl.newshosting.com!nntp-relay.ihug.net!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<3ee19817$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3ee36749@newsgroups.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10cc67,3cf3a4bed32fbb6 X-Google-Attributes: gid10cc67,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-08 11:30:48 PST From: "Chris" <Chris8852@adelphia.net> Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi References: <3ee19817$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3ee36749@newsgroups.borland.com> Subject: Re: Behavior of inline Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2003 14:03:02 -0400 Lines: 9 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.65.164.124 Message-ID: <3ee37a56$1@newsgroups.borland.com> X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1055095382 68.65.164.124 (8 Jun 2003 11:03:02 -0700) Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-09!supernews.com!newshosting.com!news-xfer1.atl.newshosting.com!nntp-relay.ihug.net!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail