🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi
Article #17713

Re: Dual Processor Programing

#17713
From: Colin Hughes
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:26
117 lines
5279 bytes
Thanks Phil,Early

Seems my longwinded reply whent adrift.

Busy reading links
Thank Again
Colin

"Phil Robertson" <PhilR80245@aol.com> wrote:
>Another solution for real time processing is to use an embeded NT real time
>controller.
>
>See the following links abot using Windows as a real time controller.
>
>http://www.realtime-info.be/magazine/97q2/winntasrtos.htm
>http://www.realtime-info.be/magazine/97Q2/winntext.htm
>http://www.e-i.fh-hamburg.de/international/rts.html
>
>Here's some links to companies who supply NTRTC
>
>http://www.disensors.com/orch.html
>http://www.hitex.co.uk/venturcom/
>http://www.realtimeonline.com/
>http://www.theragens.com/misc/MR%20-%20Windows%20NT%20Real-Time.htm
>
>
>--
>Phil Robertson
>
>BSIT   phil4114@email.uophx.edu
>Work   Phil.Robertson@hayssen.com
>Home  PhilR80245@aol.com
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>
>"Early Ehlinger" <early@respower.com> wrote in message
>news:3e5a23df@newsgroups.borland.com...
>> SetThreadIdealProcessor won't help much simply because all of the other
>> threads on the system can still preempt your thread.  Sure, you can use
>> SetThreadPriority and its ilk, but even then there are situations where
>you
>> will lose your
>> processor to somebody else.
>>
>> If you really are just trying to post-process the data, meaning it's been
>> buffered by a realtime system and there is a guarantee that it's all
>> present, you might want to spend some time looking at the memory mapped IO
>> facilities in w2k.
>>
>> If the data is placed in a binary file that resembles a big array, MMIO
>will
>> likely provide you more speed benefit than specifying which processor
>you're
>> running on.  I once had a project where I had to display huge log files
>from
>> a CPU counter log.  The intent was to display a simple line graph of the
>> performance counters complete with scrolling, zoom, etc., all while having
>> it be extremely responsive.  The problem was that I couldn't get the data
>> off of the disk fast enough to display on the screen.
>>
>> I tried playing around with thread affinity and priority, and the thing
>was
>> still totally unresponsive.  You'd scroll, wait for the thing to draw,
>zoom,
>> wait for the thing to draw, etc...  I switched from using
>> CreateFile/ReadFile to using MMIO, and got more performance benefit than
>any
>> other optimization I made during development of that project, so much so
>in
>> fact that it became usable as a result of that one change.  You'd scroll,
>> see the data at the correct position without noticing the refresh, zoom,
>see
>> the data at the correct position without noticing the refresh.  All
>because
>> Windows can take a file and map it directly into RAM.  The effect is that
>> you feel like you've got a big array at your disposal rather than a series
>> of records on disk.  Sure, you spend a little bit of time choosing which
>> "window" of the file to map in, but that's so fast that it's pretty much
>> negligible.
>>
>> If you're actually trying to capture this live data through a serial port
>or
>> something like that, then my advice is, keep your x86 PC, drop the
>> non-realtime OS and go with a true realtime OS like
>>
>> QNX Neutrino (www.qnx.com)
>> RTLinux (www.rtlinux.org) (or one of its many competitors)
>>
>>
>> --
>> -- Early Ehlinger CEO, ResPower Inc - Toll-Free : 866-737-7697 --
>> - RenderFarm - Lightwave , 3dSMax , Bryce , Maya , AfterEffects -
>> --- www.respower.com -- 400+ GHz Starting At USD$0.50/GHz*Hour --
>> ----------------- SuperComputing For the Masses! ----------------
>> "I'm so busy programming my computer to let me be lazy, I never
>> get any rest!" - John Kaster
>>
>> "Coin Hughes" <colin_r_hughes@lineone.net> wrote in message
>> news:3e578290$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
>> >
>> > Thanks Gambit
>> >
>> > I am trying to post process live data (pressure traces) from a diesel
>> engine in real time even though Window 2000 is not a real time system.
>> >
>> > Hope SetThreadIdealProcessor (NT only)works in win 2000.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > colin
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3e67e738$1@newsgroups.borland.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!news.kweb.on.ca!KWeb!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail
References: <3e554bf9$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3e55631c$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3e572048@newsgroups.borland.com> <3e578290$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3e5a23df@newsgroups.borland.com> <3e65450b$1@newsgroups.borland.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10cc67,cf095fab10686386
X-Google-Attributes: gid10cc67,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-06 22:28:21 PST
From: "Colin Hughes" <colin_r_hughes@lineone.net>
Sender: "Colin Hughes" <colin_r_hughes@lineone.net>
Reply-To: "Colin Hughes" <colin_r_hughes@lineone.net>
Subject: Re: Dual Processor Programing
Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi
X-User-Info: 80.225.17.21 80.225.17.21    
References: <3e554bf9$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3e55631c$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3e572048@newsgroups.borland.com> <3e578290$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <3e5a23df@newsgroups.borland.com> <3e65450b$1@newsgroups.borland.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.105.83.65
Message-ID: <3e67e738$1@newsgroups.borland.com>
Date: 6 Mar 2003 16:26:32 -0800
X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1046996792 207.105.83.65 (6 Mar 2003 16:26:32 -0800)
Lines: 118
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!news.kweb.on.ca!KWeb!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail