🚀 go-pugleaf

"Ed Mulroy [TeamB]" <dont_email_me@bitbuc.ket> wrote in message 
news:47e186a4@newsgroups.borland.com...

> What HOOKPROC is (from winuser.h)
>
> typedef LRESULT (CALLBACK* HOOKPROC)(
>     int code,
>     WPARAM wParam,
>     LPARAM lParam);

It is only declared that way when STRICT is defined, which is usually not 
the case (it is not in amol's, as evident by the error message he showed). 
The full declaration is as follows:

    #ifdef STRICT
    typedef LRESULT (CALLBACK* HOOKPROC)(int code, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM 
lParam);
    #else
    typedef FARPROC HOOKPROC;
    #endif

FARPROC is defined in windef as follows:

    #ifdef _WIN64
    typedef INT_PTR (FAR WINAPI *FARPROC)();
    #else
    typedef int (FAR WINAPI *FARPROC)();
    #endif

> Change your function to be
>
> LRESULT CALLBACK KeyboardProc(int ncode, wParam wparam, lParam lparam)
>
> so that it matches the type for which SetWindowsHookEx is supposed to 
> receive.

His original declaration already matches what a keyboard hook is supposed to 
use.  Your change, on the other hand, won't compile.

> You are passing an HINSTANCE to the wParam argument

No, he's not.  He's passing an HINSTANCE to SetWindowsHookEx(), not 
KeyboardProc().


Gambit