🚀 go-pugleaf

Hmm,

I need to read what I have written before I click the send button :(

The line
 val =  (Romcode + i) & (1 << b % 8));

Should be
 val =  *(RomCode + i) & (1 << b % 8));

Sorry.

This was an interesting exercise, which is the reason I had a go at it.

Regards

Bruce

"Bruce Knowles" <knowle_b@mtn.co.za> wrote in message 
news:433937cc@newsgroups.borland.com...
> HI ScOe,
>
> I have mulled over your remark for a bit, and wonder about the following.
>
> I think the term RomCode[i] is in fact not generating the address as I 
> initially intended.
>
> In fact, the address could be in fact an offset relative to the start 
> address supplied in the calling mechanism.
>
> To be precise here, I think the address generated is original offset +  (i 
> * sizeof(TxROMCode)); The intention is to address the individual bytes of 
> the TxROMCode structure.
>
> As a result your solution of  *RomCode[i] is also probably not the correct 
> solution.
>
> Two ways to address this that occur to me are:
>
> val = ((char *)RomCode) [i] & (1 << (b %8));
>
> or
>
> val =  (Romcode + i) & (1 << b % 8));
>
> The other manipulation routines should also be amended in a similar 
> fashion.
>
> Maybe you should try this ??
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Bruce
>
> "ScOe" <__cbinders@hotmail.com__> wrote in message 
> news:4338f3fe$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
>>> Andrue Cope's query of my posting triggered a recognition of an error 
>>> that
>> I
>>> had made in the code previously supplied. Herewith an updated version of
>>> that code that should now suffice.
>>>
>>> Thanks to Andrue Cope for his observation.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Bruce Knowles
>>
>> Ok, this seems to be correct accept few minor mistakes.
>>
>>>
>>>         // Get the Sernumbit
>>>         val = RomCode[i] & (1 << (b % 8));
>>>
>> i think this one should be *RomCode[i], because on call like you wrote i 
>> get
>> illegal use of pointer error.
>>
>> Thank you all for your help!
>>
>>
>
>