🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi
Article #6252

Re: threads memory access

#6252
From: bogon
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 18:30
34 lines
2733 bytes
Jonathan Benedicto wrote:
> "Dennis Jones" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message 
> news:429354a6@newsgroups.borland.com...
> 
>>A critical section is the most efficient (in terms of performance) 
>>kernel
>>mode synchronization primitive.  If you are looking for performance, 
>>a
>>critical section is the way to go.  Though it might seem slower 
>>than, say, a
>>boolean lock, it is safe, while a boolean lock is not.
>>
>>On the other hand, depending on what the other threads are doing, it 
>>might
>>be faster to lock the whole vector, do your search, and then unlock 
>>(as
>>opposed to locking each element individually).
> 
> Thank you for this input. I'm going to try a critical section, and see 
> how it works out.

Jonathan :  To reduce the size and amount of time spent within the 
Critical Section, you might consider using a Critical Section to manage 
only the 'Boolean lock' access then you can be certain of the 'lock' 
status ie.  <CS begin>test or transition boolean/<CS end>.  It also 
means only the entry you're working on is restricted (by the CS) rather 
than the entire vector.
---------->  signature = 6 lines follows <--------------
Neil Duffee, Joe SysProg, U d'Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont, Canada
telephone:1 613 562 5800 x4585                 fax:1 613 562 5161
mailto:NDuffee of uOttawa.ca     http:/ /aix1.uottawa.ca/ ~nduffee
"How *do* you plan for something like that?" Guardian Bob, Reboot
"For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism."
"Systems Programming: Guilty, until proven innocent" John Norgauer 2004
Technical Details
Message-ID: <429b5bdb$1@newsgroups.borland.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail
References: <428e4b3f$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <4291c5b1$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <4291ed05$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <429354a6@newsgroups.borland.com> <429356ac$1@newsgroups.borland.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10cc67,f662da50ec5f6f69
X-Google-Attributes: gid10cc67,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 14:30:52 -0400
From: bogon <foo@bar>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-ca, fr-ca
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi
Subject: Re: threads memory access
References: <428e4b3f$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <4291c5b1$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <4291ed05$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <429354a6@newsgroups.borland.com> <429356ac$1@newsgroups.borland.com>
In-Reply-To: <429356ac$1@newsgroups.borland.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.122.170.33
Message-ID: <429b5bdb$1@newsgroups.borland.com>
X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1117477851 137.122.170.33 (30 May 2005 11:30:51 -0700)
Lines: 35
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail