Article View: borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi
Article #9053Re: File TimeStamp
From: JD
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 11:02
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 11:02
13 lines
1243 bytes
1243 bytes
"Andrue Cope [TeamB]" <no.spam@spammy.com> wrote: > >The server sets the timestamps by referring to its own clock. There >should actually be no difference between the client and server since >the client would normally have synchronised itself with the server >anyway. That's just what I thought but simple observation wasn't good enough and I had spent enough time trying to find the answer myself. Thanks. ~ JD
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<411759cc$1@newsgroups.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<411743ee$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <41174c50@newsgroups.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10cc67,14079767772d8419 X-Google-Attributes: gid10cc67,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: "JD" <nospam@nospam.com> Sender: "JD" <nospam@nospam.com> Reply-To: "JD" <nospam@nospam.com> Subject: Re: File TimeStamp Newsgroups: borland.public.cppbuilder.nativeapi X-User-Info: 172.175.181.170 References: <411743ee$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <41174c50@newsgroups.borland.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.105.83.66 Message-ID: <411759cc$1@newsgroups.borland.com> Date: 9 Aug 2004 04:02:36 -0700 X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1092049356 207.105.83.66 (9 Aug 2004 04:02:36 -0700) Lines: 14 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail