🚀 go-pugleaf

Hi Francisco,

> Oooops . I forget to tell that i tried it too with this version of Sleep.
> 
> void SleepB (DWORD t)
> {
> 
>   DWORD StartTime =GetTickCount();
>   n=0;
>   while (GetTickCount()- StartTime < t)
>        {
>         n++;
>        }
> }
> 
> But It  DELAYS 15 ms or 16 ms too!?!?
> 
> I undersatand that the thread suspend execution but there is much diference.
> 
> However this method consumes too much CPU %.

1. The resolution of GetTickCount is not enough for measuring 
milliseconds. Use QueryPerformanceCounter and QueryPerformanceFrequency 
to get exact results.

2. Use timeBeginPeriod() and timeEndPeriod() to get more precise Sleeps. 
When your work load is low this will work quite accurate.

3. Increase the priority of your thread (if you have one). But remember 
that you don't have to use busy loops with high priority.

4. If that's not enough use a multimedia timer (as said here before)

5. If all of that doesn't help then write your own driver or use a 
special kind of hardware for that purpose.

Bye, Oliver.