🚀 go-pugleaf

Michael Mason wrote:
> 
> 
> We're not worried about Win2K just yet (Service Pack 1 isn't out yet... ;)
> Are you saying that if I have two source files in my project that don't depend
> on each other, they will not be built in parallel?
> 

No it will not.  It does do background compilation so your compiling is being
done in a different thread than the IDE, but it does not do parallel compiling.

> If not, we might as well just get fast Athlons instead of Dual PIIIs.
> 
> : Check your header files.  Well designed header files will greatly reduce compile
> : time.  You can look at www.bcbdev.com for a great article on constructing header
> : files correctly.
> 
> I'd define "correct" header files to be ones that include only the other headers
> that are actually needed. The main suggestion in that article is to lump all of
> the headers used anywhere into one big header file, so it can be precompiled.
> This might work, but surely it destroys any notion of modularity I once had?
> Classes that previously couldn't access information defined in each other now can,
> and I can make programming mistakes because of this.
> 
> So I guess I should use that technique for now, and bear in mind that every now
> and again I should do a proper compile without any precompiled stuff, to check
> things are right.
> 
> Cheers,
> Mike.

-- 
Jeff Overcash (TeamB) 
      (Please do not email me directly unless  asked. Thank You) 
If there is somebody up there could they throw me down a line.  Just a
little helping hand just a little understanding.  Just some answers to the
questions that surround me now.  If there's somebody up there could
they throw me down a line.               (Fish)