Thread View: borland.public.cppbuilder.upgrade
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by nhmark64
Sun, 22 Jan 2006 16:34
what STL does BCB 2006 support?
Author: nhmark64
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 16:34
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 16:34
8 lines
1114 bytes
1114 bytes
Hi, I am curently using stlport_4(1).5_for_c_builder_6. Does BCB 2006 support a STL? If so is it backwards compatible with stlport_4(1).5_for_c_builder_6? Thanks, Mark
Re: what STL does BCB 2006 support?
Author: AlisdairM
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:04
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:04
29 lines
1910 bytes
1910 bytes
nhmark64@newsgroup.nospam wrote: > I am curently using stlport_4(1).5_for_c_builder_6. Does BCB 2006 > support a STL? If so is it backwards compatible with > stlport_4(1).5_for_c_builder_6? BCB2006 license their STL from Dinkumware, who are probably the most respected vendor of standard libraries in the market - for most customers this will be A Very Good ThingTM. I don't think there is a bug-compatible STLport implementation available, so if you rely on specific features or extensions in STLport you will have a little upgrading to do. If your code simply relied on ISO Standard Library, then it should compile fine. We found a few obscure bugs in our own code while evaluating the upgrade, mostly to do with const correctness. So we think the upgrade is a good thing ;?) Likewise, it looks like the bug-compatible version of Rogue Wave that shipped with BCB6 is also gone. So you will definitely have to move forward if you make the upgrade. Unless you are doing something strange in the way you use the STL though, I really wouldn't expect this to be a troublesome part of the upgrade. -- AlisdairM(TeamB)
Re: what STL does BCB 2006 support?
Author: nhmark64
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:44
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:44
32 lines
2272 bytes
2272 bytes
Thanks, I will give it a try On 22 Jan 2006 12:04:07 -0700, "AlisdairM" <alisdair.meredith@uk.renaultf1.com> wrote: >nhmark64@newsgroup.nospam wrote: > >> I am curently using stlport_4(1).5_for_c_builder_6. Does BCB 2006 >> support a STL? If so is it backwards compatible with >> stlport_4(1).5_for_c_builder_6? > >BCB2006 license their STL from Dinkumware, who are probably the most >respected vendor of standard libraries in the market - for most >customers this will be A Very Good ThingTM. > >I don't think there is a bug-compatible STLport implementation >available, so if you rely on specific features or extensions in STLport >you will have a little upgrading to do. If your code simply relied on >ISO Standard Library, then it should compile fine. > >We found a few obscure bugs in our own code while evaluating the >upgrade, mostly to do with const correctness. So we think the upgrade >is a good thing ;?) > >Likewise, it looks like the bug-compatible version of Rogue Wave that >shipped with BCB6 is also gone. So you will definitely have to move >forward if you make the upgrade. > >Unless you are doing something strange in the way you use the STL >though, I really wouldn't expect this to be a troublesome part of the >upgrade.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads