🚀 go-pugleaf

Well that was fast. Less than 12 hours to bump up against the rules 
monotor.

Thanks for the pointer to qc.borland.com, but your criticism of cross 
posting stikes me as a touch... touchy. 

Prithee which of the 365 groups on this server is the realm of the rules? 

Of those 365 groups I count a bare 10 or so with double digit or better 
message counts. So it seemed to me reasonable to assume that few of these 
were truly active, and that it might be a good way to get the feel of the 
community if I should cross post to the most active groups my observation 
of a possible problem with the Borland product. Sorry if that was a 
problem, you know - like alerting people to stuff.

But if you'd rather shuffle this news off to QC without further 
discussion (even if someone else might actually be interested), well 
bully for you. By the way, do you have a list of topics, areas of 
thought, bug lists (know and unknown), peeves and pet projects that we 
all should steer clear of / encourage discussion of? If so the please 
accept this as an RFC.


"Marc Rohloff [TeamB]" <"on request"> wrote in 
news:1m58ujeusgz1j.dlg@marcrohloff.40tude.net:

> On 14 Nov 2004 07:48:46 -0700, Lambert Heenan wrote:
> 
> Lambert,
> 
> It is against the newsgroup rules to cross-post. 5 groups is way more
> than is necessary.
> 
> Secondly I would recommend you post bugs in QualityCentral
> (qc.borland.com)
> 
> follow up set to borland.public.csharpbuilder.ide.debugger
>