🚀 go-pugleaf

Dan Barclay wrote:

> Using Delphi 2007
> 
> In previous versions of Delphi I could navigate to function
> declarations using Ctrl-Click on the instance, or I could Ctrl-Click
> on an Interface declaration to navigate to the Implementation.  I
> could also Ctrl-Click on the Implementation declaration to go back
> and forth between Interface and Implementation.
> 
> Now it seems that using Find Declaration to navigate between
> implemenation and interface declarations of a procedure no longer
> works.  What was put in its place, and where do I find that in the
> documentation?

I still can (using the December update, which is still a funny
"version" number).

As soon as you press Ctrl and hover the mouse over an item it should
turn blue/underlined (assuming default colour scheme).

Does Ctrl+Shift+ArrowUp/ArrowDown still function for you?

-- 
Pieter

"Pieter Zijlstra" <p.zylstra.notthis@hccnet.nl> wrote in 
message news:xn0flmr87ajb0x000@newsgroups.borland.com...
> Dan Barclay wrote:
>
>> Using Delphi 2007
>>
>> In previous versions of Delphi I could navigate to 
>> function
>> declarations using Ctrl-Click on the instance, or I could 
>> Ctrl-Click
>> on an Interface declaration to navigate to the 
>> Implementation.  I
>> could also Ctrl-Click on the Implementation declaration 
>> to go back
>> and forth between Interface and Implementation.
>>
>> Now it seems that using Find Declaration to navigate 
>> between
>> implemenation and interface declarations of a procedure 
>> no longer
>> works.  What was put in its place, and where do I find 
>> that in the
>> documentation?
>
> I still can (using the December update, which is still a 
> funny
> "version" number).

I don't think I've installed that yet (I can't remember what 
I installed last).  I've been in the middle of some work and 
didn't want to disturb the systems.  Maybe this weekend. 
Good to know that still works.

>
> As soon as you press Ctrl and hover the mouse over an item 
> it should
> turn blue/underlined (assuming default colour scheme).
>
> Does Ctrl+Shift+ArrowUp/ArrowDown still function for you?

Yes, that works and it's exactly what I want to do... I 
didn't know it was there.

Now off to find it in the documentation to see what else I 
don't know about.

Thanks!
Dan

Dan Barclay wrote:

> Now off to find it in the documentation to see what else I don't know
> about.

Be careful, the more you learn, the less you know ;-)

-- 
Pieter

"Pieter Zijlstra" <p.zylstra.notthis@hccnet.nl> wrote in 
message news:xn0flmxvcjksfp000@newsgroups.borland.com...
> Dan Barclay wrote:
>
>> Now off to find it in the documentation to see what else 
>> I don't know
>> about.
>
> Be careful, the more you learn, the less you know ;-)

No kidding.  I found the page listing the default key 
mappings (again).  Sheesh.  No way to remember all that.  I 
guess I'll have to write 'em on the back of my hands.

Interestingly I find that the Ctrl-Shift-UpArrow and 
Ctrl-Shift-Downarrow have the same description text.  They 
also seem to do exactly the same thing.  I thought one was 
the inverse of the other but that doesn't seem to be the 
case.  Makes you wonder why they are two different 
keystrokes.

Dan

Dan Barclay wrote:

> No kidding.  I found the page listing the default key mappings
> (again).  Sheesh.  No way to remember all that.  I guess I'll have to
> write 'em on the back of my hands.

I have given up on remembering all the available hotkeys. I am using a
mouse :)
(just right-click every now and then, and you'll see what's possible)

Tiedo

"Tiedo Kruisselbrink" <tiedo_kruisselbrink@aon.nl> wrote in 
message news:479dd1d2@newsgroups.borland.com...
> Dan Barclay wrote:
>
>> No kidding.  I found the page listing the default key 
>> mappings
>> (again).  Sheesh.  No way to remember all that.  I guess 
>> I'll have to
>> write 'em on the back of my hands.
>
> I have given up on remembering all the available hotkeys. 
> I am using a
> mouse :)
> (just right-click every now and then, and you'll see 
> what's possible)

Thanks Tiedo

That's what I'd  been doing on most things, but this one 
(find declaration) wasn't working even with the mouse menu. 
It would always take me to the interface declaration, even 
if that's where I was.

I downloaded the latest patch and the mouse declaration now 
works, even with the mouse.

Dan

Pieter Zijlstra wrote:

> (using the December update, which is still a funny "version" number).

Well, if the versions are called after years, why shouldn't the updates
be called after months? <g>

Of course you can refer to it by the build number, but I find December
much easier to remember. <g>
-- 
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]        http://www.teamb.com

"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. 
 But, in practice, there is." -- Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut

Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] wrote:

> Pieter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > (using the December update, which is still a funny "version"
> > number).
> 
> Well, if the versions are called after years, why shouldn't the
> updates be called after months? <g>

Good point :) Although I liked the term D7.1 much better then this
longish "CRS2007 Delphi Win 32 R2 (or was it Update 3) with December
update" (just talking about the version number, nothing else).

> Of course you can refer to it by the build number, but I find December
> much easier to remember. <g>

True, recently I noticed somebody talking about 10.0.2558.35231 and
looked at my own version of BDS2006 at home, it said 10.0.2288.42451.
Oh man, I'm behind, but what update did I miss ?-)  (Hint HotFix 12).

So in short I'm not a big fan of build numbers also, I would prefer
something like CRS2007 SP4.

-- 
Pieter

Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] wrote:

> Pieter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > (using the December update, which is still a funny "version"
> > number).
> 
> Well, if the versions are called after years, why shouldn't the
> updates be called after months? <g>
> 
> Of course you can refer to it by the build number, but I find December
> much easier to remember. <g>

Hmm, a product called 2007 with a December update, what are the chances
of another update and what will it be called? <g>

-- 
Pieter

Pieter Zijlstra wrote:

> Hmm, a product called 2007 with a December update, what are the
> chances of another update and what will it be called? <g>

The update must not necessarily come in the same year as the product
was released.
-- 
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]        http://www.teamb.com

"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."
 -- Thomas Watson (1874-1956), Chairman of IBM, 1943

Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] wrote:

> Pieter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > Hmm, a product called 2007 with a December update, what are the
> > chances of another update and what will it be called? <g>
> 
> The update must not necessarily come in the same year as the product
> was released.

That sounds like a PC answer ;-)

-- 
Pieter