Re: IB for Linux VS IB for NT

Article View: borland.public.interbase.linux

Article #23

Back to borland.public.interbase.linux Previous Next

#23

From: Sergey Mereutsa
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 00:00

14 lines
1050 bytes

I tested 50 sim processes on my Linux workstation - CPU usage was ~ 80% at AMD K6-2/400 with 64M RAM and IDE HDD. So, U must think about migration.

Best regards, Serj.

Daniel Olivares wrote:

> I'm actually using IB6 in NT, it works fine but when I have 30 users in a
> Network and they are getting reports, the performance of the servers goes
> down. I have listened to say this doesn't happen with a Linux server.
>
> Question:
>
> 1.  Is that true?
> 2.  Do you recommend me migrate from NT to Linux?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3A11967F.23C27EFD@dnt.md>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <39f5f571_1@dnews>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109030,4e12517b49041a74
X-Google-Attributes: gid109030,public
From: Sergey Mereutsa <mediafon@dnt.md>
Subject: Re: IB for Linux VS IB for NT
Date: 2000/11/14
Message-ID: <3A11967F.23C27EFD@dnt.md>
X-Deja-AN: 693603013
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <39f5f571_1@dnews>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: borland.public.interbase.linux

Reply to Parent Message