Re: IB for Linux VS IB for NT

Article View: borland.public.interbase.linux

Article #25

Back to borland.public.interbase.linux Previous Next

#25

From: Dan Palley
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 00:00

25 lines
1314 bytes

I'd look at your report SQL and try to optimize it as much as possible
first.  We regularly run 60-70 users against a database on NT.

Dan

"Sergey Mereutsa" <mediafon@dnt.md> wrote in message
news:3A11967F.23C27EFD@dnt.md...
> I tested 50 sim processes on my Linux workstation - CPU usage was ~ 80% at
AMD K6-2/400 with 64M RAM and IDE HDD. So, U must think about migration.
>
> Best regards, Serj.
>
> Daniel Olivares wrote:
>
> > I'm actually using IB6 in NT, it works fine but when I have 30 users in
a
> > Network and they are getting reports, the performance of the servers
goes
> > down. I have listened to say this doesn't happen with a Linux server.
> >
> > Question:
> >
> > 1.  Is that true?
> > 2.  Do you recommend me migrate from NT to Linux?
>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3a11b11b$1_1@dnews>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <39f5f571_1@dnews> <3A11967F.23C27EFD@dnt.md>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109030,4e12517b49041a74
X-Google-Attributes: gid109030,public
From: "Dan Palley" <dan@trams.com>
Subject: Re: IB for Linux VS IB for NT
Date: 2000/11/14
Message-ID: <3a11b11b$1_1@dnews>
X-Deja-AN: 693644384
References: <39f5f571_1@dnews> <3A11967F.23C27EFD@dnt.md>
X-Trace: 14 Nov 2000 13:39:39 -0800, 206.183.199.132
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
Newsgroups: borland.public.interbase.linux
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

Reply to Parent Message