Article View: borland.public.interbase.opensource
Article #189Re: Timestamp and the fractions of a second
From: Craig Stuntz TeamB
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 13:37
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 13:37
14 lines
1547 bytes
1547 bytes
Gara wrote: > Is this a bug in IB6 or is my syntax incorrect? Neither, really. IB does not have the feature of full support for milliseconds in a timestamp. There are historical reasons for this, and there's a QC request open to add the feature, but for the time being you really have to store milliseconds in a different way. -- Craig Stuntz [TeamB] . Vertex Systems Corp. . Columbus, OH Delphi/InterBase Weblog : http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz All the great TeamB service you've come to expect plus (New!) Irish Tin Whistle tips: http://learningtowhistle.blogspot.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4370b80c@newsgroups.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news2.volia.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<4370a31b$1@newsgroups.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 106772,e6bb3eafe40b98bd X-Google-Attributes: gid106772,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: "Craig Stuntz [TeamB]" <craig_stuntz@nospam.please [a.k.a. acm.org]> Subject: Re: Timestamp and the fractions of a second Newsgroups: borland.public.interbase.opensource References: <4370a31b$1@newsgroups.borland.com> Organization: Vertex Systems Corporation User-Agent: XanaNews/1.17.6.4 X-Face: "huzh55Xi]!ZNni78>a*5+).`SK?<^q2MlHk-C]Z2M9T@\J5ZCB$95Ey+s"XQuhGFA[eutZ:0^AV!Q;t>gE`1-=8d;HZ6~*o1dH<X9\b$!|(}+I'!Xq)@3Op}%0ArW&nf'Qh*EwR NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.106.104.204 Message-ID: <4370b80c@newsgroups.borland.com> Date: 8 Nov 2005 06:37:00 -0700 X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1131460620 24.106.104.204 (8 Nov 2005 06:37:00 -0700) Lines: 14 X-Authenticated-User: cstuntz Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news2.volia.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail