Article View: borland.public.interbase.opensource
Article #306Re: IB602 x Win2003
From: Marcelo Carvalho
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 19:47
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 19:47
44 lines
2747 bytes
2747 bytes
Hi,
So if I use a non HT and non multiprocessor machine (or use IB_Affinity),
AND rename the database file to another extension, it's supposed to have a
normal performance on Win 2003 Server and Win XP?
Regards,
Marcelo Carvalho
"Bill Todd" <no@no.com> escreveu na mensagem
news:4166e414@newsgroups.borland.com...
> There is no performance penalty for running on Win2003 as long as you
> avoid the performance penalty caused by system restore trying to backup
> files with the .gdb extension.
>
> The performance penalty occurrs when the O/S swaps the Ib process from
> one processor to another. It makes no difference whether the processors
> are virtual or physical. It is the context switch that takes the time.
>
> --
> Bill (TeamB)
> TeamB cannot answer questions received via email
>
> Marcelo Carvalho wrote:
>
>> But will the performance be reduced in single processor and non HT
>> machines, as happens to Win2003 Server?
>>
>> Marcelo Carvalho
>>
>> "Bill Todd" <no@no.com> escreveu na mensagem
>> news:4166d077$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
>> > Both.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Bill (TeamB)
>> > TeamB cannot answer questions received via email
>> >
>> > Marcelo Carvalho wrote:
>> >
>> >> So you mean that in Win XP the problem occurs only in HT machines,
>> >> right? Or just real multi CPU machines?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4166ef91$1@newsgroups.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!prodigy.com!atl-c02.usenetserver.com!c03.atl99.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!news02.tsnz.net!newsfeed01.tsnz.net!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<41646e26@newsgroups.borland.com> <41648935$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <416558ee$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <41657370@newsgroups.borland.com> <41658ece$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <416593ae$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <41669d70@newsgroups.borland.com> <4166a394$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <4166c137$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <4166d077$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <4166d2dd@newsgroups.borland.com> <4166e414@newsgroups.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 106772,b89b6911098b5a7d X-Google-Attributes: gid106772,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: "Marcelo Carvalho" <mc_nospam@arquivo.com.br> Newsgroups: borland.public.interbase.opensource References: <41646e26@newsgroups.borland.com> <41648935$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <416558ee$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <41657370@newsgroups.borland.com> <41658ece$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <416593ae$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <41669d70@newsgroups.borland.com> <4166a394$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <4166c137$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <4166d077$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <4166d2dd@newsgroups.borland.com> <4166e414@newsgroups.borland.com> Subject: Re: IB602 x Win2003 Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:47:41 -0300 Lines: 46 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original NNTP-Posting-Host: 200.183.9.133 Message-ID: <4166ef91$1@newsgroups.borland.com> X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1097265041 200.183.9.133 (8 Oct 2004 12:50:41 -0700) Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!prodigy.com!atl-c02.usenetserver.com!c03.atl99.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!news02.tsnz.net!newsfeed01.tsnz.net!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail