Article View: borland.public.interbase.opensource
Article #5470Re: Open Source or For Sale?
From: Erwin van den Bosch
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 21:22
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 21:22
44 lines
3118 bytes
3118 bytes
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 09:17:23 -0800, Ben Matterson <bmatterson@borland.com> wrote: >Binary files from Borland are required to go though a fair amount of >review before being posted. As a business, why would Borland invest >that kind of time and effort in something that would 1) provide no >return on that investment and 2) take away revenue from the certified >version? Ben, As you know binary files are the result of the source code. What you saying is that you put the source code on the internet without testing? As a business it is normal to make money with good products. (some can even make money with bad products! No naMeS:=) But i don't understand why you open sourced interbase in the first place. What was it's goal? I thought (correct me) that borland wanted interbase a widely used product so they could sell support. I think the difference in money between a version of interbase that works great but open source that cost nothing and a certified version is to big. How can i sell a certified version to my customers for $1200? Till now they get a free version that works great. And if i let my customers simply let them choose what will the choose? I think the free version because they don't see what they get for $1200. And what if application "A" uses a open source version of interbase and program "B" uses the certified version. And application "B" checks if the certified version is installed. Installed on the same computer. I think that will not work because of version mismatch. In the BDE years it was simple. Just install the latest version and al programms which uses the bde should work. I bring this up because our company had a probleem with a bank who had an application working under interbase 5.6 (certified) Our program uses 6.01 OS. The bank applications won't work anymore. The bank don't want to support OS versions of interbase. (till now it was not possible to install a certified version of 6.01) The only thing we could advise our customer was to switch bank! (he did!) So what is your solution to this versioning problem? Erwin van den Bosch.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3ac4f258.28551702@forums.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed1.uni2.dk!newssuck.uni2.dk!dnews!194.109.238.148References:
<3ab6fad2_1@dnews> <3AB7A11E.A59BE7EB@borland.com> <3ac49d75.48857097@forums.borland.com> <3AC4BFA3.22C45DCD@borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 106772,d3d776b8a4d2f325 X-Google-Attributes: gid106772,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-03-30 13:44:06 PST From: erwin@tng.xs4all.nl (Erwin van den Bosch) Newsgroups: borland.public.interbase.opensource Subject: Re: Open Source or For Sale? Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 21:22:11 GMT Organization: TNG applications Message-ID: <3ac4f258.28551702@forums.borland.com> References: <3ab6fad2_1@dnews> <3AB7A11E.A59BE7EB@borland.com> <3ac49d75.48857097@forums.borland.com> <3AC4BFA3.22C45DCD@borland.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.109.238.148 X-Trace: 30 Mar 2001 13:24:17 -0800, 194.109.238.148 Lines: 44 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed1.uni2.dk!newssuck.uni2.dk!dnews!194.109.238.148