Article View: borland.public.interbase.opensource
Article #60Re: Which FreeWare/OpenSource Interbase is the best?
From: Jeff Overcash (TeamB)
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:32
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:32
21 lines
2310 bytes
2310 bytes
Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
>
> The Classic architecture handles SMP just fine.
Not according to Jim Starkey, the original architect of InterBase -
"I understand you you're saying, particularly since I designed it that way. But
classic doesn't scale well for update intensive applications, doesn't meet
contemporary standards for robustness, and has unenforceable security. If you
are looking for an existence proof, yes, it does run on SMP, but not in a manner
attractive to new users."
--
Jeff Overcash (TeamB)
(Please do not email me directly unless asked. Thank You)
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher
a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build
a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act
alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer,
cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for
insects. (RAH)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<456eeb5c$1@newsgroups.borland.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news2.volia.net!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.freenet.de!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<456abc46@newsgroups.borland.com> <456b4f58$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <456bbcc0$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <456bc83a$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <456d02d7$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <456d1ac6$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <456d33f0@newsgroups.borland.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 106772,bfde2af1f896c514 X-Google-Attributes: gid106772,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:32:18 -0500 From: "Jeff Overcash (TeamB)" <jeffovercash@mindspring.com> Organization: TeamB User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: borland.public.interbase.opensource Subject: Re: Which FreeWare/OpenSource Interbase is the best? References: <456abc46@newsgroups.borland.com> <456b4f58$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <456bbcc0$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <456bc83a$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <456d02d7$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <456d1ac6$1@newsgroups.borland.com> <456d33f0@newsgroups.borland.com> In-Reply-To: <456d33f0@newsgroups.borland.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.32.172.217 Message-ID: <456eeb5c$1@newsgroups.borland.com> X-Trace: newsgroups.borland.com 1164897116 66.32.172.217 (30 Nov 2006 06:31:56 -0700) Lines: 21 X-Authenticated-User: overcash Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news2.volia.net!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.freenet.de!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsgroups.borland.com!not-for-mail