🚀 go-pugleaf

hhhhmmmm ya, that would make too much sense right? :>

Actually I'm sure there is some reason that I can't think of at the moment,
but that is something I'm going to have to look into.  Thanks for the heads
up. :>




"Gillmer J. Derge [TeamB]" <spam@gillmerderge.com> wrote in message
news:3cd028c1$1_1@dnews...
> "PeterH" <!REMOVEBeforeSending!peter@pchenry.com> wrote in message
> news:3cd0236e$1_1@dnews...
> > re planning to do?
> > Actually, it was used to check types of exceptions being thrown/caught.
> We
> > are catching Exception, but we need to figure out a bit more about it to
> > know if we want to continue passing it on, or actually change it to one
> of
> > our own exceptions.
>
> Is there a reason why you don't want to do this?
>
>     try {
>       foo();
>     } catch (ExceptionClass1 e) {
>     } catch (ExceptionClass2 e) {
>     } catch (ExceptionClass3 e) {
>     } catch (ExceptionClass4 e) {
>     }
>
> --
> Gillmer J. Derge [TeamB]
>
>
>