Re: The affect of thread.interupt() ??

Article View: borland.public.jbuilder.java.api

Article #1589

Back to borland.public.jbuilder.java.api Previous Next

#1589

From: John Baker
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:57

4 lines
1173 bytes

I'm not sure why you are not using the more usual method of Object.wait()
and Object.notify() to do this kind of thing? When work appears you can
interupt the blocked code this way. Read some good book on threading
synchronization issues and it'll save you a lot of headaches...

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3c15d527_2@dnews>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!PeerFeed.KWeb.on.ca!dnews

References: <3bfbdd19$1_1@dnews> <3bfbe126$1_2@dnews> <3bfbe517$1_1@dnews>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1089d0,71862bc66236ba1d
X-Google-Attributes: gid1089d0,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-11 01:50:50 PST
From: "John Baker" <jbaker@SoftComms.com>
Newsgroups: borland.public.jbuilder.java.api
References: <3bfbdd19$1_1@dnews> <3bfbe126$1_2@dnews> <3bfbe517$1_1@dnews>
Subject: Re: The affect of thread.interupt() ??
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:57:37 -0000
Lines: 6
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.135.255.65
Message-ID: <3c15d527_2@dnews>
X-Trace: dnews 1008063783 217.135.255.65 (11 Dec 2001 01:43:03 -0800)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!PeerFeed.KWeb.on.ca!dnews

Reply to Parent Message