🚀 go-pugleaf

He needs to assign null to the last instance of the mt2 only, the previous
mt2's reference is already gone by assigning a new thread object to it...
ali


"Joi Ellis" <joi@aravox.com> wrote in message
news:39C7D2AE.9BC2E7D0@aravox.com...
> banxuegang wrote:
> >
> > HI,
> > Thank you for your help. But it is hard to post my source codes here, it
is
> > too long.
> > But something like below:
> >
> > class myThread1  extends Thread
> > {
> > ......
> > public void main()
> > {
> >     myThread1 t1=new myThread1();
> >     myThread1 t2=new myThread1();
> >     t1.start();
> >     t2.start();
> > }
> >
> > public void run()
> > {
> >     while(true)
> >     {
> >          myThread2 mt2=new myThread2();
> >         mt2.start();
> >         ....
> >     }
> > }
>
> Erf.  Okay, so every type this loop runs, you're firing
> off a new thread.  Do you ever assign null back to mt2?
> Is anything else storing a reference to mt2?
>
> Does mt2.run() ever exit?
>
>
>
> --
> Joi Ellis                    Software Engineer
> Aravox Technologies          joi@aravox.com, gyles19@visi.com
>
> No matter what we think of Linux versus FreeBSD, etc., the one thing I
> really like about Linux is that it has Microsoft worried.  Anything
> that kicks a monopoly in the pants has got to be good for something.
>            - Chris Johnson