🚀 go-pugleaf

I know, and it will likely be there in perpetuity.  However, I don't think
that package is present in the IBM JRE so there are some (albeit limited)
portability issues.  Personally, I'm happy to use anything that's available,
portable or not, if it gets the job done in a simple and elegant way.

-- 
Check out our latest white papers at
http://www.datadevelopment.com/papers/index.html

BladeNET Scores With Borland Enterprise Tools
Team Development with JBuilder and Borland Enterprise Server

Dolphin Data Development Ltd.
http://www.datadevelopment.com/

"Lori M Olson (TeamB)" <javadragon@techie.com> wrote in message
news:406261cc$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> Kevin Dean wrote:
>
> > Strangely enough, there's no standard base 64 encoding package.  You can
use
> > sun.misc.BASE64Encoder and sun.misc.BASE64Decoder or, if you're using
the
> > Apache Xerces XML parser there's org.apache.xerces.util.Base64.  The
latter
> > is the preferred option as anything in the sun.* packages is by
definition
> > not guaranteed portable across multiple JVM's.
> >
>
> Ya know, I've heard that "not guaranteed portable" argument about
> sun.misc version for a while now.  But as far as I can remember, it's
> been there, working, since JDK 1.1.something.
>
> -- 
>
> Regards,
>
> Lori Olson (TeamB)
>
> ------------
>
> Save yourself, and everyone else, some time and search the
> newsgroups and the FAQ-O-Matic before posting your next
> question.
>
> Google Advanced Newsgroup Search
>      http://www.google.ca/advanced_group_search
> Other Newsgroup Searches:
>      http://www.borland.com/newsgroups/ngsearch.html
> Joi Ellis's FAQ-O-Matic:
>      http://www.visi.com/~gyles19/fom-serve/cache/1.html
>